<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK research in physics now second in the world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ajb/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ajb/?p=1385</link>
	<description>Random thoughts on mathematics, physics  and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 06:42:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ajb/?p=1385&#038;cpage=1#comment-14470</link>
		<dc:creator>ajb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ajb/?p=1385#comment-14470</guid>
		<description>@DrRocket: you can find the report at http://www.iop.org/publications/iop/2012/page_53959.html

I hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DrRocket: you can find the report at <a href="http://www.iop.org/publications/iop/2012/page_53959.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.iop.org/publications/iop/2012/page_53959.html</a></p>
<p>I hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrRocket</title>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ajb/?p=1385&#038;cpage=1#comment-14446</link>
		<dc:creator>DrRocket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ajb/?p=1385#comment-14446</guid>
		<description>What in the hell is &quot;normalized citation impact&quot; ?  Lots of countries and lots of scientists do excellent work.  British physicists have always been at the forefront.  But this strikes me as a silly attempt to measure the imponderable. 

This is nearly as dumb as the &quot;which scientist is the smartest&quot; debates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What in the hell is &#8220;normalized citation impact&#8221; ?  Lots of countries and lots of scientists do excellent work.  British physicists have always been at the forefront.  But this strikes me as a silly attempt to measure the imponderable. </p>
<p>This is nearly as dumb as the &#8220;which scientist is the smartest&#8221; debates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
