{"id":21,"date":"2010-07-27T10:06:26","date_gmt":"2010-07-27T09:06:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/ajb\/?p=21"},"modified":"2010-07-27T10:06:26","modified_gmt":"2010-07-27T09:06:26","slug":"is-three-the-new-two","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/ajb\/2010\/07\/27\/is-three-the-new-two\/","title":{"rendered":"Is &quot;three&quot; the new &quot;two&quot;?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The number \u201ctwo\u201d may appear to be very special in theoretical physics, but maybe it has had it&#8217;s day&#8230;<\/p>\n<p> By this we mean that much of physics is described in terms of \u201cbinary objects\u201d: Lie brackets, commutators, metrics, rank two curvature tensors, quadratic Lagrangians, two dimensional world sheets of strings, Poisson structures, symplectic two forms, Laplacians and I am sure the list goes on. However, it has become increasingly clear in recent years that \u201chigher objects\u201d play an important role in theoretical physics as well as modern geometry.<\/p>\n<p>For example, it has become increasingly clear that  n-aray generalisations of Lie algebras play a role in physics. The Sh Lie algebras of Stasheff and the (not completely unrelated) n-Lie algebras of Filipov are great examples here. In one form or another, they can be found behind the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Batalin%E2%80%93Vilkovisky_formalism\">BV-antifield formalism<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/String_field_theory\">Zwiebach\u2019s closed string field theory<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kontsevich_quantization_formula\">Kontsevich\u2019s deformation quantisation of Poisson manifolds<\/a>,<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Nambu_mechanics\"> Nambu&#8217;s generalised mechanics<\/a> and the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bagger-Lambert-Gustavsson_action\">Bagger\u2013Lambert\u2013Gustavsson (BLG) description of multiple<br \/>\nstacked M2 branes<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The last one has been of interest to me lately.<\/p>\n<p>So, M-theory was introduced by Witten in 1995 as a non-perturbative unification of the various superstring theories. Here, the fundamental objects are not strings but extended membranes of dimension 2 and 5, the so called M2 and M5 branes. Since then progress has been slow. No-one really knows what M-theory is and there is no proper understanding of the dynamics of interacting branes.<\/p>\n<p>Then in Bagger &amp; Lambert [2] in 2006 and independently Gustavsson [3] in 2007 construct and effective action for the low energy description of a stack of two M2 branes.  The novel feature here is that 3-Lie algebras play a role here. A 3-Lie algebra should be thought of as a &#8220;Lie algebra&#8221;  but with a tribracket not a bibracket. Details should not worry us.<\/p>\n<p> The theory has the fields take their values in a 3-Lie algebra  and their is a novel gauge symmetry. However, the original BLG-model can be recast as a conventional gauge theory, the ABJM theory [1]. So it starts to look that maybe 3-Lie algebras are some weird artificial artefact of  M2 branes.<\/p>\n<p>(There are many, many papers on the arXiv dealing with modifying the original BLG model. This usually can be understood in terms of 3-Lie algebra. I won&#8217;t say any more right now.)<\/p>\n<p>But then very recently, Lambert &amp; Papageorgakis [4] provided evidence that the effective description on M5 branes would also require 3-Lie algebras. However, they have not yet produced an action, which would be essential if the more or less standard methods of quantisation were to be applied.<\/p>\n<p>This is fascinating. M-theory seems to be deeply tied to the theory of n-aray algebras, and in particular 3-aray algebras.  There are may open questions  here, both from a physics and mathematics point of view. In all it looks like n-aray algebra are here to stay.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br \/>\n<strong>REFERENCES<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>[1] Ofer Aharony, Oren Bergman, Daniel Louis Jafferis, and Juan Maldacena. N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals. <em>JHEP<\/em>, 10:091, 2008.<\/p>\n<p>[2] Jonathan Bagger and Neil Lambert. Modeling multiple M2\u2019s. <em>Phys. Rev<\/em>., D75:045020, 2007.<\/p>\n<p>[3] Andreas Gustavsson. Algebraic structures on parallel M2-branes. <em>Nucl. Phys<\/em>., B811:66\u201376, 2009.<\/p>\n<p>[4] Neil Lambert and Constantinos Papageorgakis. Nonabelian (2,0) Tensor Multiplets and 3-algebras. 2010,<br \/>\narXiv:1007.2982 [hep-th].<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The number \u201ctwo\u201d may appear to be very special in theoretical physics, but maybe it has had it&#8217;s day&#8230; By this we mean that much of physics is described in terms of \u201cbinary objects\u201d: Lie brackets, commutators, metrics, rank two curvature tensors, quadratic Lagrangians, two dimensional world sheets of strings, Poisson structures, symplectic two forms, &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/ajb\/2010\/07\/27\/is-three-the-new-two\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Is &quot;three&quot; the new &quot;two&quot;?<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/ajb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/ajb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/ajb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/ajb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/ajb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/ajb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/ajb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/ajb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/ajb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}