Handwaving my way through explaining handwaving.

The following is based on a conversation with a friend on IRC earlier…

So what is handwaving? We often hear people describe something as handwaving…

So here’s my take on what a handwaving argument is:

There’s no real evidence or scientific rigour shown you just say “well it kinda works like this” and say something that sounds ligitimate but without every saying why it is legitimate, or really explaining anything.

I’ll explain this with a quick example, the Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect, is a change in the polarisation state of light incident on a magnetised sample. It’s a purely quantum mechanical effect relying on the exchange interaction, but a handwaving argument of how it works is:

The incident photon comes in and is absorbed by an electron, because the field of the photon is oscillating the electron oscillates, but as it’s magnetised and a moving charge there is a lorentz force applied to the electron:

\mathbf{F}=q(\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B})

So this changes the oscillation direction, so when the photon reemits the photon the oscillation direction has changed and therefore the polarisation state is different.

Everything I’ve said is wrong, it’s a classical interpretation that cannot be applied, and yet it sounds perfectly fine! Now the thing you didn’t see is that when I explain this to people I wave my hands around to give some idea, implying a physical reality that just isn’t true…
So why do we do this? Simply Because it can turn REALLY complicated things into just some bloke waving his hands about…

2 Responses to “Handwaving my way through explaining handwaving.”

  1. antimatter Says:


    I think I’m going to have to read that again…

  2. the tree Says:

    I’ve come to view hand waving as skipping rigour in situations when rigour just isn’t interesting. “some phenomena happens randomly” is handwavey whereas “so-and-so goodness of fit test [source] for the Poisson distribution over the intervals between each event [source] gives a test statistic of blah blah blah etc etc so we can accept that it happens randomly [source]” is not, so for the sake of getting things done, handwaving can be quite a good thing.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This blog proudly hosted by ScienceForums.Net Blogs. Subscribe to our RSS Logo global RSS feed.