<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cap'n Refsmmat's Blog of Doom &#187; uncertainty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.scienceforums.net/capn/tag/uncertainty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/capn</link>
	<description>Otherwise known as "I couldn't think of a clever title."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:50:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Relationship Uncertainty Principle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/capn/2008/05/20/the-relationship-uncertainty-principle/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/capn/2008/05/20/the-relationship-uncertainty-principle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 02:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cap&#39;n Refsmmat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uncertainty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/capn/2008/05/20/the-relationship-uncertainty-principle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A long long time ago, a friend and I wrote a document on the science of relationships. It was mostly silly, but it did have one section that wasn&#8217;t just made up. That section was on the Relationship Uncertainty Principle. The RUP works in a fashion similar to Heisenberg&#8217;s Uncertainty Principle in quantum physics. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A long long time ago, a friend and I wrote a document on the science of relationships. It was mostly silly, but it did have one section that wasn&#8217;t just made up. That section was on the Relationship Uncertainty Principle.</p>
<p>The RUP works in a fashion similar to Heisenberg&#8217;s Uncertainty Principle in quantum physics. The idea is simple: at any given time in a two-person relationship, you cannot simultaneously know each party&#8217;s feelings for the other <em>and</em> how those feelings are changing.</p>
<p>Perhaps an example would help explain it.<br />
<span id="more-45"></span><br />
Suppose Alice and Bob are in a platonic relationship. Bob, infatuated with Alice, professes his love to her, but she tells him he&#8217;s &#8220;only a friend.&#8221; Each party now knows the other&#8217;s feelings &#8212; but neither party knows how the other&#8217;s feelings have been changed by this epiphany. Upon learning how the other&#8217;s feelings have changed, each person will inevitably experience a change in their own feelings.</p>
<p>So there&#8217;s an element of uncertainty in all human relationships. We have to operate blindly, essentially.</p>
<p>When I first wrote the RUP, I was only semi-serious. It made sense in the world of my contrived example (different than the one above, which is actually hypothetical &#8212; really!), but I didn&#8217;t really apply it to the real world. Only today did I stop and think about it, and wow, I think the Principle fits <em>perfectly</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/capn/2008/05/20/the-relationship-uncertainty-principle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
