{"id":314,"date":"2012-07-31T18:51:18","date_gmt":"2012-07-31T23:51:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/capn\/?p=314"},"modified":"2015-06-01T00:04:01","modified_gmt":"2015-06-01T00:04:01","slug":"statistics-done-wrong-how-scientists-abuse-statistics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/capn\/2012\/07\/31\/statistics-done-wrong-how-scientists-abuse-statistics\/","title":{"rendered":"Statistics Done Wrong: How scientists abuse statistics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Statistical results are everywhere in science. When the Higgs boson discovery was announced, nearly every news article mentioned how there was just a one in 1.74 million chance that the results were a statistical fluke. Well, that&#8217;s not entirely true: some said one in 5 million, others one in 2 million, others one in a million.<\/p>\n<p>All of them were wrong.<\/p>\n<p>The science journalists had fallen into one of the most common statistical traps in modern science. Read through recently-published scientific papers and you will find many other errors, from the subtle to the glaring. Scientists often aren&#8217;t formally taught statistics, so data analysis tends to be a seat-of-the-pants affair.<\/p>\n<p>There are many kinds of error and many examples in the literature, so I decided to put together a guide. No prior statistical knowledge required. I hope you&#8217;ll read it through, print a copy, and use it to smack people who continue to make statistically unjustified claims.<\/p>\n<p>Link: <a title=\"Statistics Done Wrong\" href=\"http:\/\/www.statisticsdonewrong.com\">Statistics Done Wrong, a guide<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Statistical results are everywhere in science. When the Higgs boson discovery was announced, nearly every news article mentioned how there was just a one in 1.74 million chance that the results were a statistical fluke. Well, that&#8217;s not entirely true: some said one in 5 million, others one in 2 million, others one in a&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-314","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/capn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/capn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/capn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/capn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/capn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=314"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/capn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":322,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/capn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314\/revisions\/322"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/capn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=314"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/capn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=314"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/capn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=314"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}