Totally nonlinear, dude!
What’s one of the first thing students learn in high school about nucleic acid molecules? It’s that DNA is double stranded and RNA is single stranded. Not only is this fundamentally incorrect, such type of “linear” thinking is, I would argue, a ‘dangerous’ line of thinking, that may be hard for students to escape from.
Any biochemistry student can tell you that, not only can certain types of RNA form secondary and tertiary structures, but that these structures are critical to understanding the catalytic activity of RNA. This has important revelations for evolution (the RNA-first world hypothesis) and for molecular biology.
Microbiology Bytes ran a segment on The shape of HIV RNA (see image below). The higher order, 3 dimensional structure of HIV RNA could play some important role in viral replication and pathogeneiss

This example serves to illustrate the important point that higher order RNA structure could more important in biology than we could have imagined. Therefore, if we keep giving students the impression that RNA (and other molecules) are linear and static, than they could carry with them a false veiw of biological models.
Coincidently, this also is another reason that computational and mathematical modeling in biology will become all important in the coming years. As it turns out, biochemical structures are just too complex to realistically model without computers (at least not easily).
And, as it turns out, even knowing three dimensional structures may not be enough. Carlos Simmerling from Stony Brook University does computational modeling of biomolecular systems (specifically proteins and nucleic acids) as dynamic entities. In other words, intra-interactions, as predicted by mechanics, cause molecules to “move and shake.” These molecular “vibrations” caused by electrostatic interactions could also greatly potentially affect reactivity of molecules in ways we could have never predicted without computer modeling. Simmerling also develops tools to view these molecules in their energetic states. Here’s a video from Simmerling’s group of the enzyme HIV Protease.
These developments stress the need for new scientists (yes, even biologists) to think mathematically and artistically. We need to be aware of all three dimensions (plus the time dimension) in order to work towards building accurate models of biological and biochemical systems.
May 12th, 2008 at 4:05 pm
This is not quite my field. Has the 3-dimensional structure of HIV RNA been proposed somewhere? I don’t suppose you would have a link? Just curious.
May 12th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
As far as I know, only the 2d structure has been explored, at least for now. Perhaps AJ Cann at Microbiology Bytes knows more than I. (just follow the link).
August 25th, 2008 at 11:04 am
Looking at things four dimentionally does not just apply to RNA, but proteins as well. Certainly I found in by early years of learning proteins were fixed blobby models that stayed awkwardly in form. I’m having to ditch that mindset fairly rapidly, as see them more as moving things.
I blame microscopy :) It completely removes most of the dimensions (although obviously it’s still very useful).
December 10th, 2008 at 1:40 am
Thanks for the info, for low level Microbiology students it has been very hard to get something that is visual at the level of Nursing or Allied health fields, i.e. General Microbiology. Recently, Minnay Institute of Health Sciences has made a bold step of producing General Microbiology lectures on DVDs and Video for that level students and it has been very helpful for my students as supplemental material and also the mandatory reference for my online students, I hope this helps somebody, the videos can be found at http://www.minnay.com/vd/microbiology.html
Scaley,C. MD, PhD