<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Lenski responds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ecoli/2008/06/25/richard-lenski-responds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ecoli/2008/06/25/richard-lenski-responds/</link>
	<description>a science and medicine related weblog from scienceforums.net</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: thoughts from gut bacteria &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DaveScot on Lenksi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ecoli/2008/06/25/richard-lenski-responds/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>thoughts from gut bacteria &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DaveScot on Lenksi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ecoli/2008/06/25/richard-lenski-responds/#comment-529</guid>
		<description>[...] DaveScot, an IDiologist who writes for the uncommondescent blog has claimed to have found a mistake in Richard Lenski&#8217;s paper. (which I first talked about here) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DaveScot, an IDiologist who writes for the uncommondescent blog has claimed to have found a mistake in Richard Lenski&#8217;s paper. (which I first talked about here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecoli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ecoli/2008/06/25/richard-lenski-responds/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>ecoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ecoli/2008/06/25/richard-lenski-responds/#comment-526</guid>
		<description>yeah... we pay taxes so we deserve to be spoon fed information about a complicated area of research that we'll reject anyway in favor of our creation myth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah&#8230; we pay taxes so we deserve to be spoon fed information about a complicated area of research that we&#8217;ll reject anyway in favor of our creation myth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ecoli/2008/06/25/richard-lenski-responds/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ecoli/2008/06/25/richard-lenski-responds/#comment-524</guid>
		<description>Conservapedia links to it from their front page with this text:

"Lenski's latest response to a request for his data is revealing ... about Lenski's attitude. Take a good look at the attitude our tax dollars are paying for."

Yeah, nice comeback, LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservapedia links to it from their front page with this text:</p>
<p>&#8220;Lenski&#8217;s latest response to a request for his data is revealing &#8230; about Lenski&#8217;s attitude. Take a good look at the attitude our tax dollars are paying for.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, nice comeback, LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
