<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Theory of Moral Sentiments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ecoli/2008/07/29/theory-of-moral-sentiments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ecoli/2008/07/29/theory-of-moral-sentiments/</link>
	<description>a science and medicine related weblog from scienceforums.net</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: scicurious</title>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ecoli/2008/07/29/theory-of-moral-sentiments/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>scicurious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ecoli/2008/07/29/theory-of-moral-sentiments/#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>I'm reposting this here just in case you don't happen to pop back over to my site. :)

I am impressed. I know that lots of people have a hard time ‘getting’ philsophy at first unless it’s guided in some way. 

Do not consider yourself unfortunate. The best philosophers tend to be the ones who never took a real philosophy course, because they are the ones most likely to strike out on their own and come up with new directions instead of sticking to the old tired questions. 

Once you’re done with the 18th century, may I recommend studying Karl Popper? He’s considered one of the founders of the modern philosophy of science as it is taught today. Also, on the other side, is Ludwig Wittgenstein, who’s TLP is just mind-boggling. 

Perhaps we should have some discussions and you can make me pick up Hume again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reposting this here just in case you don&#8217;t happen to pop back over to my site. :)</p>
<p>I am impressed. I know that lots of people have a hard time ‘getting’ philsophy at first unless it’s guided in some way. </p>
<p>Do not consider yourself unfortunate. The best philosophers tend to be the ones who never took a real philosophy course, because they are the ones most likely to strike out on their own and come up with new directions instead of sticking to the old tired questions. </p>
<p>Once you’re done with the 18th century, may I recommend studying Karl Popper? He’s considered one of the founders of the modern philosophy of science as it is taught today. Also, on the other side, is Ludwig Wittgenstein, who’s TLP is just mind-boggling. </p>
<p>Perhaps we should have some discussions and you can make me pick up Hume again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
