<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.8.6" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>The Caveman's Corner</title>
	<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/evoanthro</link>
	<description>A blogs.scienceforums.net weblog on evolution, man and monkey, with miscellany.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:29:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Chris Beard Fires Back on Ida</title>
		<description>Apparently the backlash against the media storm that came in with Ida has begun. Chris Beard wrote in the New Scientist this week utterly dismissing Ida as anything but an adapoid. With a diagram.



Where Beard sees Darwinius

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17173-why-ida-fossil-is-not-the-missing-link.html

The main thrust:

What does Ida's anatomy tell us about her place on the family ...</description>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/evoanthro/2009/06/05/chris-beard-fires-back-on-ida/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Weird mistake in D. masillae paper?</title>
		<description>I noticed this reading through the paper for my last post. I'll quote how the authors describe Table 3:
Table 3 lists 30 anatomical and morphological characteristics commonly used to distinguish extant strepsirrhine and haplorhine primates. They were taken from the standard primate textbook by Fleagle [74], form the classic W. ...</description>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/evoanthro/2009/05/24/weird-mistake-in-d-masillae-paper/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Darwinius as a &#8220;Missing Link&#8221;</title>
		<description>I've finally gotten around to reading the PLoS ONE paper describing Darwnius masillae, the newly descrived adapoid from Messel, Germany, represented by a remarkably (95%)  complete skeleton of an immature (approximately 1 y/o) female. The media blitz that accompanied the announcement of the fossil on May 20th put heavy emphasis ...</description>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/evoanthro/2009/05/23/darwinius-as-a-missing-link/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Review: The Gilded Dinosaur, Mark Jaffe</title>
		<description>American science was largely a phenomenon of the latter half of the 19th Century. Before the Civil War, Harvard and Yale held an almost complete monopoly on university science in the United States, though their own scientific output was still dwarfed by the work of scattered amateurs in local academies ...</description>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/evoanthro/2009/05/21/review-the-gilded-dinosaur-mark-jaffe/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Huge Little Adapoid</title>
		<description>In storm of media hype, including a special tribute from Google, a new little adapiform fossil has surfaced from Messel, Germany, formerly of Archeopteryx fame. Her name is  Darwinius masillae,  or 'Ida,' apparently. And she is beautiful:



http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090519-missing-link-found.html



Apparently this thing had been lingering in private collections for 23 years until it ...</description>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/evoanthro/2009/05/20/huge-little-adapoid/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
