<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Where Will Our Energy Come?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/132/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/132</link>
	<description>Physics, tech and humor.  Because science and learning are cool, and life's too short not to laugh.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:45:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nanook</title>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/132/comment-page-1#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 05:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/132#comment-847</guid>
		<description>Personally, I believe nuclear fusion is likely to play a significant part in the future, but I don&#039;t think the current mainstream path, that of the conventional Tokamak is the way to go from a purely economic standpoint.  The Spherical Tokamak is better, but I&#039;m really hopeful the Bussard Polywell reactor will work out, so far it&#039;s looking pretty impressive.  It&#039;s compact, it&#039;s cheap, and it doesn&#039;t require exotic materials, and on paper at least it looks like it will be able to burn aneutronic fuels such as hydrogen-boron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I believe nuclear fusion is likely to play a significant part in the future, but I don&#8217;t think the current mainstream path, that of the conventional Tokamak is the way to go from a purely economic standpoint.  The Spherical Tokamak is better, but I&#8217;m really hopeful the Bussard Polywell reactor will work out, so far it&#8217;s looking pretty impressive.  It&#8217;s compact, it&#8217;s cheap, and it doesn&#8217;t require exotic materials, and on paper at least it looks like it will be able to burn aneutronic fuels such as hydrogen-boron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Energy and Physics &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/132/comment-page-1#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Energy and Physics &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/132#comment-629</guid>
		<description>[...] and&#160;Physics  Tom Swanson over at Swans on Tea has an interesting post on the energy situation, giving some much-needed corrections to a lengthy post by another blogger [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and&nbsp;Physics  Tom Swanson over at Swans on Tea has an interesting post on the energy situation, giving some much-needed corrections to a lengthy post by another blogger [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecoli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/132/comment-page-1#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>ecoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/132#comment-362</guid>
		<description>depressing... that&#039;s swansont</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>depressing&#8230; that&#8217;s swansont</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
