Star Power Trajectories

Slate‘s Hollywood Career-O-Matic

A visitor to the Rotten Tomatoes site can check out the data for individual Hollywood careers—that’s how Tabarrok came up with the Shyamalan graph—but there’s no easy way for users to measure industrywide trends or to compare different actors and directors side-by-side. To that end, Rotten Tomatoes kindly let Slate analyze the scores in its enormous database and create an interactive tool so our readers might do the same.

It only works from 1985 on, on the hypothesis that people tend not to review old clunkers as often as the classics, which results in sampling bias and this is what skews the older results.

As a general trend, actors seem to be all over the place, score-wise, but directors tend to get better over time.

In this Concave Space, Defined by Orthogonal Dividers, …

Multiplication smackdown: Sal Khan vs Vi Hart—who’s got the ‘insight’?

As usual, Vi delivers a gigantic heaping of insight into what multiplication is, why these algorithms work, along with a handful of sarcasm and one of the most important critiques of math education and obsession with notation I’ve seen in the past month or so.

(New Vi Hart video in the link)

One has to acknowledge that there are different goals in mind for the two videos, but a shortcoming of “turn the crank” cookbook instruction is that you won’t know what to do if you ever encounter a new situation, which is why conveying the deeper understanding is a winner in the long run. Add some enthusiasm for the beauty of math, and that will help foster an interest.