{"id":1075,"date":"2008-12-04T16:11:06","date_gmt":"2008-12-04T21:11:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=1075"},"modified":"2008-12-04T16:11:06","modified_gmt":"2008-12-04T21:11:06","slug":"well-blow-me-down","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/1075","title":{"rendered":"Well Blow Me Down"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over at Good Math, Bad Math, Mark has a takedown of a device purported to move directly downwind, faster than the wind.  <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/goodmath\/2008\/12\/windpowered_perpetual_motion.php\">Wind-Powered Perpetual Motion<\/a>  (and <a href=\"http:\/\/wordmunger.com\/?p=997\">Dave Munger thinks he&#8217;s wrong<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the video<\/p>\n<p><object class=\"embed\" width=\"425\" height=\"264\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" \ndata=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/xHsXcHoJu-A?fs=1\"><param name=\"wmode\" value=\"transparent\" \/><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/xHsXcHoJu-A?fs=1\" \/><em>You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video<\/em><\/object><\/p>\n<p>The objection is simple:  when you are traveling at the wind speed, there is no more wind in the cart reference frame, so there&#8217;s no force.  The treadmill analysis is flawed.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If you&#8217;re testing a <em>wind powered vehicle<\/em>, then in a closed, windless room, putting the vehicle on a treadmill moving at 10mph is <em>not<\/em> the same thing as putting the vehicle on a stationary surface in a 10mph wind.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>By putting it on a treadmill, you haven&#8217;t recreated the real-world situation \u2014 you always have your wind, and the treadmill doesn&#8217;t remove that.  You never test the condition of having the wind <em>relative to the cart<\/em> drop to zero.  So while it&#8217;s not faked, it&#8217;s still a sham.<\/p>\n<p>It shouldn&#8217;t be hard to engineer a device such that the wheels rotate faster than the propeller, i.e. whatever the propeller&#8217;s rotation rate is for a wind of speed X, the wheel edges move faster than X. Since the wind is always present, the cart will move forward on the treadmill moving at X.  Even uphill.<\/p>\n<p>My question is this:  if this works, at what speed does the cart stop accelerating?<\/p>\n<p>UPDATE:  Or with no wind present, as in the test (On the first viewing I thought they had a fan turned on) what you&#8217;re doing is converting treadmill kinetic energy into propulsion by turning the propeller.  But you don&#8217;t need to have much propulsion to move forward, even uphill.  <del datetime=\"00\">Not a valid test.<\/del><\/p>\n<p>Update, Mark II.  See the comments \u2014 I was viewing this from the mistaken notion that the propeller was acting as a turbine while on the ground and at low speed, which isn&#8217;t the case.<\/p>\n<p>This has the implication, I think, that the cart must have enough mass to ensure that the propeller acts as a propeller.  My question of what the maximum speed is still stands, because I&#8217;m sure it involves fluid mechanics and that&#8217;s not something I&#8217;ll win should I tangle with it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over at Good Math, Bad Math, Mark has a takedown of a device purported to move directly downwind, faster than the wind. Wind-Powered Perpetual Motion (and Dave Munger thinks he&#8217;s wrong.) Here&#8217;s the video You need to a flashplayer enabled &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/1075\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,63],"tags":[106,373],"class_list":["post-1075","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-physics","category-video","tag-bad-physics","tag-perpetual-motion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1075","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1075"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1075\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}