{"id":1086,"date":"2008-12-05T13:27:30","date_gmt":"2008-12-05T18:27:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=1086"},"modified":"2008-12-05T13:27:30","modified_gmt":"2008-12-05T18:27:30","slug":"redactovision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/1086","title":{"rendered":"Redactovision"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.theonion.com\/content\/node\/43014\">CIA Realizes It&#8217;s Been Using Black Highlighters All These Years<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>According to the report, sections of the documents\u2014 &#8220;almost invariably the most crucial passages&#8221;\u2014are marred by an indelible black ink that renders the lines impossible to read, due to a top-secret highlighting policy that began at the agency&#8217;s inception in 1947.<\/p>\n<p>CIA Director Porter Goss has ordered further internal investigation.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Why did it go on for this long, and this far?&#8221; said Goss in a press conference called shortly after the report&#8217;s release. &#8220;I&#8217;m as frustrated as anyone. You can&#8217;t read a single thing that&#8217;s been highlighted. Had I been there to advise [former CIA director] Allen Dulles, I would have suggested the traditional yellow color\u2014or pink.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Goss added: &#8220;There was probably some really, really important information in these documents.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CIA Realizes It&#8217;s Been Using Black Highlighters All These Years According to the report, sections of the documents\u2014 &#8220;almost invariably the most crucial passages&#8221;\u2014are marred by an indelible black ink that renders the lines impossible to read, due to a &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/1086\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,44],"tags":[487],"class_list":["post-1086","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-humor","category-satire","tag-the-onion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1086","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1086"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1086\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1086"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1086"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1086"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}