{"id":11921,"date":"2012-06-20T03:00:47","date_gmt":"2012-06-20T08:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=11921"},"modified":"2012-06-20T03:00:47","modified_gmt":"2012-06-20T08:00:47","slug":"the-hippocratic-oath-does-not-apply-here","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/11921","title":{"rendered":"The Hippocratic Oath Does Not Apply Here"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/backreaction.blogspot.com\/2012\/06\/did-opera-affair-harm-or-benefit.html\">Did the OPERA affair harm or benefit science?<\/a><\/p>\n<p>I think there was a benefit, because the actual process of science was displayed.  But your mileage varied, as always, depending on your source.  There were a lot of good stories, in which you would find explanations of what was going on.  Unfortunately, there were a lot of stories that sensationalized the events, and gave us <em>Einstein Overturned<\/em>\/<em>Relativity is Dead<\/em> &#8211; type headlines and stories, despite the fact that nobody associated with the experiment made such claims (of which I am aware, at least).  But that&#8217;s par for the course.  You have good reporting, you have bad reporting, and you have headline editors.  They care about circulation, not whether they are doing harm to physics.<\/p>\n<p>There were also instances of people stepping beyond their expertise in trying to explain the results.  People were awfully quick to blame GPS (but not one of the critiques I read came from within the timing community; we know how well you can do time transfer) and with that came some &#8220;problem solved&#8221; stories.  That, too is probably par for the course.<\/p>\n<p>I think the only real damage to any credibility was the discovery that an internal calibration\/check of the local timing system hadn&#8217;t been done in a couple of years.  That seemed sloppy.  People at the top resigned.  They took responsibility for the oversight.<\/p>\n<p>Overall I&#8217;m much happier showing off science, warts and all, than allow a stereotype to perpetuate \u2014 the mistaken notion that every announced result is the final word and that scientists see themselves as infallible.  We got to have a discussion about uncertainty and statistical significance that wasn&#8217;t framed by someone equating uncertainty with failed science.  The effect on public perception?  I don&#8217;t know.  I suspect that this just reinforced their biases \u2014 if they didn&#8217;t trust science before, this is just one more reason not to.  But, as the adage goes, there is no bad publicity.  If it raised anyone&#8217;s interest in science, that&#8217;s got to be good.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Did the OPERA affair harm or benefit science? I think there was a benefit, because the actual process of science was displayed. But your mileage varied, as always, depending on your source. There were a lot of good stories, in &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/11921\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11921","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-journalism","category-physics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11921","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11921"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11921\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11921"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11921"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11921"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}