{"id":12775,"date":"2012-11-28T03:00:59","date_gmt":"2012-11-28T08:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=12775"},"modified":"2012-11-28T03:00:59","modified_gmt":"2012-11-28T08:00:59","slug":"being-wrong","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/12775","title":{"rendered":"Being Wrong"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scientificamerican.com\/guest-blog\/2012\/11\/13\/the-key-to-science-and-life-is-being-wrong\/\">The Key to Science (and Life) Is Being Wrong<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cIt doesn\u2019t make any difference how beautiful your guess is,\u201d Feynman proclaimed, gesticulating in wide, circular, somewhat flamboyant motions. \u201cIt doesn\u2019t make any difference how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is. If it disagrees with experiment, it\u2019s wrong. That\u2019s all there is to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Feynman was absolutely right.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I agree with this; Feynman had quite a talent for being succinct.  However, the converse of this is not true:  just because a theory agrees with experiment is not sufficient to confirm that the theory is right \u2014 there&#8217;s the possibility that competing theories predict the same individual result in some experiment, especially if the prediction is vague.  It&#8217;s one reason we like mathematical models, which give us specific predictions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Key to Science (and Life) Is Being Wrong \u201cIt doesn\u2019t make any difference how beautiful your guess is,\u201d Feynman proclaimed, gesticulating in wide, circular, somewhat flamboyant motions. \u201cIt doesn\u2019t make any difference how smart you are, who made the &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/12775\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12775","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-physics","category-science-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12775","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12775"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12775\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12775"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12775"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12775"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}