{"id":1285,"date":"2009-01-28T11:56:05","date_gmt":"2009-01-28T16:56:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=1285"},"modified":"2009-01-28T11:56:05","modified_gmt":"2009-01-28T16:56:05","slug":"message-from-the-aps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/1285","title":{"rendered":"Message from the APS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I am writing to request that you IMMEDIATELY contact your elected<br \/>\nrepresentatives and let them know that the proposed Congressional<br \/>\neconomic stimulus package must include a strong investment in<br \/>\nscientific infrastructure to ensure the future competitiveness of<br \/>\nour country.  We also request that you contact House Speaker Nancy<br \/>\nPelosi to thank her for her tremendous efforts in ensuring that<br \/>\nscience infrastructure investments were included in the House<br \/>\nstimulus package, formally known as the .American Recovery and<br \/>\nReinvestment Act of 2009..  You can make these contacts quickly<br \/>\nand easily at:<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.congressweb.com\/cweb4\/index.cfm?orgcode=apspa&amp;hotissue=81\">http:\/\/www.congressweb.com\/cweb4\/index.cfm?orgcode=apspa&amp;hotissue=81<\/a><br \/>\n&amp;<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.congressweb.com\/cweb4\/index.cfm?orgcode=apspa&amp;hotissue=82\">http:\/\/www.congressweb.com\/cweb4\/index.cfm?orgcode=apspa&amp;hotissue=82 <\/a><\/p>\n<p>There, you will find pre-written messages to your Senators and<br \/>\nSpeaker Pelosi. You may send these letters as they are, modify them,<br \/>\nor write your own.  While individualizing your letter is not<br \/>\nessential, please at least make minor edits to the subject line<br \/>\nand the first line of the text of each email so that these emails<br \/>\nare more individualized.  (See webpage pointers below for further<br \/>\ninstruction.)<\/p>\n<p>As you may be aware, the U.S. Congress is currently formulating a<br \/>\nstimulus package to help spur the recovery of our economy.  In<br \/>\naddition to the tax cuts in the draft packages being discussed,<br \/>\nthe packages include a number of infrastructure investments that<br \/>\nwould create millions of jobs.<\/p>\n<p>APS has actively participated in this process by providing the<br \/>\nincoming Obama Administration, and the leadership in the House and<br \/>\nthe Senate, with recommendations for investments in scientific<br \/>\ninfrastructure that would create more than 100,000 direct and<br \/>\nindirect jobs.  The investments we proposed are principally in<br \/>\ninfrastructure in our national laboratories and universities, high<br \/>\nperformance computing, in procurements of scientific instruments<br \/>\nand material for projects such as ITER, and in creation of jobs for<br \/>\nyoung investigators at our universities to ensure that they have a<br \/>\nplace to go during these trying economic times.  As a result of our<br \/>\nefforts, many of our recommendations were used by the House and<br \/>\nSenate in formulating their proposed stimulus packages.<\/p>\n<p>On January 15th, the leadership of the House of Representatives<br \/>\nproposed a bill that would give a significant boost to science<br \/>\ninfrastructure, including allocating $2 billion for the Department<br \/>\nof Energy Office of Science (OS), $2.5 billion for the National<br \/>\nScience Foundation (NSF), $500 million for the National Institute<br \/>\nof Standards and Technology (NIST) and $100 million for advanced<br \/>\ncomputing.  On January 23rd, the Chairman of the Senate<br \/>\nAppropriations Committee released a summary of a proposed Senate<br \/>\nstimulus package.  Unfortunately, the announcement did not offer<br \/>\nmany details about how much funding science would receive in that<br \/>\npackage.  However, we are receiving troubling signs that science<br \/>\nmay not receive the same levels of funding as in the House package<br \/>\nand would even, in some scenarios, be cut or even eliminated.  We<br \/>\nare therefore urging the Senate to follow the House lead in helping<br \/>\nto ensure American competitiveness in the 21st century by making<br \/>\ncritically needed infrastructure investments.<\/p>\n<p>The attached letters would 1) thank House Speaker Pelosi for her<br \/>\nsupport of science and 2) request that the Senate follows the House<br \/>\nby including a robust amount of funding for scientific<br \/>\ninfrastructure investments.<\/p>\n<p>WEBPAGE POINTERS:<br \/>\n(1) While individualizing your letter is not essential, we ask that<br \/>\n    you make minor edits to the subject line and the first line of<br \/>\n    the text of each email.<br \/>\n(2) If you are a government employee, please do not use government<br \/>\n    resources to send a communication.<br \/>\n(3) Your browser will take you to a page where you will enter your<br \/>\n    name and address.<br \/>\n(4) After entering your address, click the .Edit\/Send Email button..<br \/>\n    A window with an individual email message to the four offices will<br \/>\n    appear. Click .Send Emails. to transmit the communication.<br \/>\n(5) Electronic submission is preferred.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I am writing to request that you IMMEDIATELY contact your elected representatives and let them know that the proposed Congressional economic stimulus package must include a strong investment in scientific infrastructure to ensure the future competitiveness of our country. We &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/1285\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40,46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-science-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1285"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1285\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}