{"id":12986,"date":"2013-01-17T03:00:27","date_gmt":"2013-01-17T08:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=12986"},"modified":"2013-01-17T03:00:27","modified_gmt":"2013-01-17T08:00:27","slug":"youve-got-an-attitude","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/12986","title":{"rendered":"You&#039;ve Got an Attitude"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1301.1069\">A Snapshot of Foundational Attitudes Toward Quantum Mechanics<\/a><\/p>\n<p>I dont get all that caught up in the issues of foundational questions of quantum mechanics; I think, for example, that the interpretations are bridges to understanding, so while I&#8217;m happy to cite the Copenhagen interpretation, I&#8217;ll also mention many-worlds if that helps \u2014 I don&#8217;t feel locked into one or the other. (There are some, though, that don&#8217;t &#8220;feel&#8221; right to me and\/or seem to have been discredited in some way, and I don&#8217;t call upon them.  I&#8217;m also not nearly as familiar with them).  I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re going to solve many of these foundational problems unless they aren&#8217;t truly foundational, in which case you then have to wrestle with the issues one level down.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless, I think this &#8220;snapshot&#8221; is interesting, in part because others do spend more time on these issues.  Also for the author and respondent comments on many of the questions.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Snapshot of Foundational Attitudes Toward Quantum Mechanics I dont get all that caught up in the issues of foundational questions of quantum mechanics; I think, for example, that the interpretations are bridges to understanding, so while I&#8217;m happy to &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/12986\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12986","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-physics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12986","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12986"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12986\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12986"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12986"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12986"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}