{"id":13473,"date":"2013-04-12T10:07:22","date_gmt":"2013-04-12T15:07:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=13473"},"modified":"2013-04-12T10:07:22","modified_gmt":"2013-04-12T15:07:22","slug":"a-mathectomy-will-kill-the-patient","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/13473","title":{"rendered":"A Mathectomy Will Kill the Patient"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2013\/04\/12\/math-and-science-are-not-cleanly-separable\/\">Math and Science Are Not Cleanly Separable<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>What I, and many other physical scientists, object to is the notion that math and science are cleanly separable. That, as Wilson suggests, the mathematical matters can be passed off to independent contractors, while the scientists do the really important thinking. That may be true in his home field (though I\u2019ve also seen a fair number of biologists rolling eyes at this), but for most of science, the separation is not so clean.<\/p>\n<p>As much as I agree with Wilson\u2019s statement about the need for detailed knowledge to constrain math, even in physics, there is also some truth to the reverse version of the statement, which I have often heard from physicists: If you don\u2019t have a mathematical description of something, you don\u2019t really understand it. Observations are all well and good, but without a coherent picture to hold them all together, you don\u2019t really have anything nailed down. Big data alone will not save you, in the absence of a quantitative model.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Yeah, what he said. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Math and Science Are Not Cleanly Separable What I, and many other physical scientists, object to is the notion that math and science are cleanly separable. That, as Wilson suggests, the mathematical matters can be passed off to independent contractors, &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/13473\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,47],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13473","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-math","category-science-y-observation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13473","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13473"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13473\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}