{"id":13647,"date":"2013-05-22T03:00:56","date_gmt":"2013-05-22T08:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=13647"},"modified":"2013-05-22T03:00:56","modified_gmt":"2013-05-22T08:00:56","slug":"good-as-gold-plastic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/13647","title":{"rendered":"Good as Gold Plastic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I ran across <a href=\"http:\/\/www.globalpost.com\/dispatch\/news\/the-canadian-press\/130516\/mounties-say-crooks-passing-fake-polymer-bank-notes-british-\">this story about Canadian counterfeiters<\/a>, and I was interested because of the quote below,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Because the polymer series&#8217; notes are so secure &#8230; there&#8217;s almost an overconfidence among retailers and the public in terms of when you sort of see the strip, the polymer looking materials, everybody says &#8216;oh, this one&#8217;s going to be good because you know it&#8217;s impossible to counterfeit,'&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;So people don&#8217;t actually check it.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>which is an interesting comment on the mindset of people. If you&#8217;ve read <em>Surely You&#8217;re Joking, Mr. Feynman<\/em> you might see there&#8217;s some similar commentary on people thinking things were safe <em>just because<\/em> (there&#8217;s a safe, or a fence) but when it came down to the details, people were pretty stupid about actually leveraging the features that would have made the systems secure. (Though Feynman explains it from a different perspective than that).<\/p>\n<p>With this presumably false sense of security, there are actually some counterfeit bills in the system<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Pound said since the polymer series was announced in 2011, police have confirmed 56 polymer counterfeit notes across Canada, out of about 500-million polymer notes in circulation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>But then it occurred to me that the article didn&#8217;t actually mention any context for these numbers, and context is important.  Is the system failing \u2014 is ten bills out of a million a big number? With a little searching I ran across an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/report-on-business\/economy\/currencies\/funny-money-how-counterfeiting-led-to-a-major-overhaul-of-canadas-money\/article554632\/?page=all\">even more interesting article<\/a> on how Canada got to the point where they decided to use polymer (don&#8217;t call it plastic!) currency.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>By [2004] Canada\u2019s counterfeit rate had ballooned to 470 PPM. That year alone, 552,692 forged banknotes were passed, a record number. Canada\u2019s PPM level was as much as 100 times the ratio of some G20 countries.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Which means that the <del datetime=\"2013-05-22T19:58:19+00:00\">10 PPM<\/del> 0.1 PPM for the polymer bills is a huge improvement and even lower than Canada&#8217;s rate in 1990, which was just 4 PPM. The article says that 50 PPM is considered the threshold for having a counterfeiting problem. So while the complacency might be a problem, the new system is working pretty well.<\/p>\n<p>edit: Fixed the last paragraph. A little mathlexia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I ran across this story about Canadian counterfeiters, and I was interested because of the quote below, &#8220;Because the polymer series&#8217; notes are so secure &#8230; there&#8217;s almost an overconfidence among retailers and the public in terms of when you &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/13647\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13647","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history","category-security"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13647","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13647"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13647\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13647"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}