{"id":15038,"date":"2014-06-23T03:00:19","date_gmt":"2014-06-23T08:00:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=15038"},"modified":"2016-02-22T21:14:03","modified_gmt":"2016-02-22T21:14:03","slug":"its-not-all-black-and-white","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/15038","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s Not All Black and White"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/mobile.geek.com\/latest\/253784-incredible-art-piece-dances-with-polarized-light\">Incredible art piece dances with polarized light<\/a><\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a video in the link with the art, which is a weird combination of kinetic sculpture and optical effects from polarizers. You don&#8217;t discern the actual motion of the polarizers, but you see a motional effect from the overlap. Sort of an opto-kinetic sculpture.<\/p>\n<p>One thing:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Polarizers are pieces of plastic made to only allow (or disallow) the transmission of light with certain polarizations. Natural light has a mixture of all different polarizations of light, and so any one of these polarizers only filters out a portion of the light. However, if you stack two with complementary polarizations, such as one that blocks about 50% of light and another that blocks the other 50% of light, then you end up with a totally opaque whole.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>To quote a phrase: that&#8217;s not how this works! That&#8217;s not how any of this works! Simple filters don&#8217;t add linearly (they multiply \u2014 two simple 50% filters would block 75% of the light), and polarizers don&#8217;t block half each. What&#8217;s actually going on is that one polarizer sets the polarization of the light (filtering the fraction that is cross-polarized), and then the second one blocks more light, both acting according to the Law of Malus<\/p>\n<p> \\(I=I_0 \\cos^2 \\theta\\)<\/p>\n<p>All the light is blocked for perpendicular orientations of the polarizers, and at varying levels of light at other angles. Randomly polarized light isn&#8217;t blocked by 50% \u2014 the transmitted intensity is roughly 75%. You can see single polarizers in the video, and tell they aren&#8217;t blocked by half.<\/p>\n<p>The second piece is in color but only has a still shot, so I don&#8217;t know if this is color filters or polarization with birefringent materials. I&#8217;ve posted <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/754\">static shots<\/a> of <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/13306\">birefringent<\/a> materials before, both using a static linearly polarized source (LCD); having the background and\/or foreground polarization and birefringent material move might make for an interesting display.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Incredible art piece dances with polarized light There&#8217;s a video in the link with the art, which is a weird combination of kinetic sculpture and optical effects from polarizers. You don&#8217;t discern the actual motion of the polarizers, but you &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/15038\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15038","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-art","category-physics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15038"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15038\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15791,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15038\/revisions\/15791"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}