{"id":15459,"date":"2014-11-05T03:00:26","date_gmt":"2014-11-05T08:00:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=15459"},"modified":"2014-11-05T03:00:26","modified_gmt":"2014-11-05T08:00:26","slug":"you-keep-using-that-word-2-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/15459","title":{"rendered":"You Keep Using That Word&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s time for another installment of &#8220;That&#8217;s Not A Clock (it&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/14070\">a stopwatch<\/a>)&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/2014\/11\/03\/361069820\/new-clock-may-end-time-as-we-know-it\">New Clock May End Time As We Know It<\/a>. This is the same technology that <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/14594\">I&#8217;d linked to back in January<\/a>, and NPR <a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/2014\/01\/24\/265247930\/tickety-tock-an-even-more-accurate-atomic-clock\">did something<\/a> back then, too. I thought maybe this was prompted by a new paper, but the story may have just been motivated by our daylight saving shift last weekend.<\/p>\n<p>I completely agree with Tom O&#8217;Brian \u2014 time is a human construct, in that it&#8217;s abstraction we came up with (but then, so is length). But I have an issue with saying that NIST has America&#8217;s master clock, while ignoring the one that resides in Washington DC, run by the navy, and that Tom O&#8217;Brian is America&#8217;s official timekeeper (i.e. singular). Sins of omission.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>This new clock can keep perfect time for 5 billion years.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\u2026if it ran continuously. But it doesn&#8217;t. Jun Ye gave a talk on this at DAMOP this past summer, and someone asked him if\/when any of these optical lattice devices were going to run as actual clocks, and how long they could run. The answer was (paraphrasing here) &#8220;about 24 hours, because people need to sleep.&#8221; NIST isn&#8217;t going to be pushing very hard to extend that, because that&#8217;s not their job. As he put it, once you get to the noise limit of the device, they sort of lose interest in running it any longer.<\/p>\n<p>The rest of it is pretty good for a pop-sci piece, aside from the observation that (as Matthew Francis <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/DrMRFrancis\/status\/529708212791287810\">tweeted at me<\/a>) <em>&#8220;end time as we know it&#8221; seems a trifle hyperbolic<\/em>. In other words, what do you mean, &#8220;we&#8221;? The issues of trying to synchronize clocks are not going to affect the vast majority of people. It&#8217;s a very interesting technical challenge, for reasons described in the article, and once people come up with applications that require picosecond-ish level of timing or better, it&#8217;s something we&#8217;ll have to solve. But it&#8217;s not going to affect whether you&#8217;re late for work or what time the game comes on. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s time for another installment of &#8220;That&#8217;s Not A Clock (it&#8217;s a stopwatch)&#8221; New Clock May End Time As We Know It. This is the same technology that I&#8217;d linked to back in January, and NPR did something back then, &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/15459\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,56],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15459","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-physics","category-time"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15459","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15459"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15459\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15459"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15459"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15459"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}