{"id":2426,"date":"2009-05-07T11:18:35","date_gmt":"2009-05-07T16:18:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=2426"},"modified":"2009-05-07T11:18:35","modified_gmt":"2009-05-07T16:18:35","slug":"a-great-un-idea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/2426","title":{"rendered":"A Great Un-Idea"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jnrbm.com\/\">Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine<\/em> is ready to receive manuscripts on all aspects of unexpected, controversial, provocative and\/or negative results\/conclusions in the context of current tenets, providing scientists and physicians with responsible and balanced information to support informed experimental and clinical decisions.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>One of the reasons that the popular press report studies that have come out with surprising, but ultimately wrong, results is that you&#8217;re going to get that 3-sigma outlier 5% of the time, and without a baseline of null results you might assume that the outlier is, in fact, typical.  It&#8217;s only <em>after<\/em> the &#8220;Cold Poison Good for You!&#8221; headline that it&#8217;s worthwhile to publicize the contrary (and expected) result.  And who would have published that study, before now?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine is ready to receive manuscripts on all aspects of unexpected, controversial, provocative and\/or negative results\/conclusions in the context of current tenets, providing scientists and physicians with responsible and &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/2426\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-other-science","category-science-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2426","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2426"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2426\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}