{"id":287,"date":"2008-05-10T09:22:53","date_gmt":"2008-05-10T14:22:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/287"},"modified":"2008-05-10T09:22:53","modified_gmt":"2008-05-10T14:22:53","slug":"silly-blog-games-part-i-robo-tag","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/287","title":{"rendered":"Silly Blog Games, Part I:  Robo-Tag"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In my brief time in the blog-o-truncated-icosahedron (I&#8217;m not convinced it&#8217;s a sphere), I&#8217;ve gotten to know and be indifferent to the automatic pingback.  The strange and wonderful spiders\/bots that crawl the web and look for keywords, and link to your blog post.  Much of the time, it happens because of some innocuous term you&#8217;ve included \u2014 just yesterday, I wrote about some non-hoops player being <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/282\">officially included in the NBA draft<\/a>, and made mention of the NFL, and got a pingback from somebody&#8217;s NFL-themed blog.  I <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/195\">mentioned taxes<\/a> the weekend before April 15th, and got three tax-related pingbacks.  They obviously were not from people who had read the post.<\/p>\n<p>So I got to thinking, (always a dangerous thing)<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>What word could one use to maximize the pingbacks? Not that this is a noble or desirable goal or anything.  I imagine many blogs just turn off the feature of allowing pingbacks in the comments if and when it becomes plague-level<\/p>\n<p>Could this play on any competitive nature bloggers might have?<\/p>\n<p>And would they be willing to &#8220;waste&#8221; a post doing something so stupid? The answer that is almost certainly, &#8220;yes&#8221; from the &#8220;many-blogs&#8221; interpretation of the universe that I just made up:  there isn&#8217;t a topic so stupid that you can&#8217;t find <em>somebody<\/em> to blog about it.  Case in point.<\/p>\n<p>But we need rules.  This should be a one-shot experiment based on your own experiences and ingenuity, rather than using multiple iterations.<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 The post shall be eight words in length, and the length of the post shall be eight (five is right out!).  Just written out as a (probably) nonsensical sentence<br \/>\n\u2014 No links in the post, or anything embedded or invisible<br \/>\n\u2014 Title should be the same for everyone: &#8220;Robo-tag blog game&#8221;  No fair sneaking in extra words here!<br \/>\n\u2014 Sites that already pingback to everything you post don&#8217;t count<br \/>\n\u2014 Multiple attempts (if you really want to go there) can&#8217;t duplicate words from a previous post<\/p>\n<p>And, of course, anything else I can think of that will maximize my chances of winning.  (Having a small number of regular readers, not all of whom blog, certainly helps with <em>that<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Seriously&#8221; though, any other rules anyone can think of?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In my brief time in the blog-o-truncated-icosahedron (I&#8217;m not convinced it&#8217;s a sphere), I&#8217;ve gotten to know and be indifferent to the automatic pingback. The strange and wonderful spiders\/bots that crawl the web and look for keywords, and link to &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/287\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,51],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-287","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-admin","category-silly"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=287"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=287"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=287"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}