{"id":6701,"date":"2010-10-01T06:52:24","date_gmt":"2010-10-01T11:52:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=6701"},"modified":"2010-10-01T06:52:24","modified_gmt":"2010-10-01T11:52:24","slug":"experts-are-called-experts-for-a-reason","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/6701","title":{"rendered":"Experts are Called &quot;Experts&quot; for a Reason"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/climatesight.org\/2010\/09\/25\/dont-listen-to-the-newspapers\/\">Don\u2019t Listen to the Newspapers<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Presented in terms of the climate &#8220;debate,&#8221; but the thrust is true in general.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>97.6% of publishing climatologists, 100% of studies in scientific journals, and every scientific organization in the world now agree that humans are changing the climate.<\/p>\n<p>Compare this to the media coverage of climate change. The majority of articles in respected newspapers like The New York Times or The Wall Street Journal give roughly equal time to the \u201ctwo sides\u201d of the so-called \u201cscientific debate\u201d. Balance in journalism is all very well when the issue is one of political or social nature, but for matters of science, giving fringe opinions the same weight as a robust consensus is misleading. <strong>Being objective is not always the same as being neutral<\/strong>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>(emphasis added, just because)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Don\u2019t Listen to the Newspapers Presented in terms of the climate &#8220;debate,&#8221; but the thrust is true in general. 97.6% of publishing climatologists, 100% of studies in scientific journals, and every scientific organization in the world now agree that humans &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/6701\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,24,46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6701","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-environment","category-journalism","category-science-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6701","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6701"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6701\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6701"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6701"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6701"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}