{"id":728,"date":"2008-09-02T04:08:52","date_gmt":"2008-09-02T09:08:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=728"},"modified":"2008-09-02T04:08:52","modified_gmt":"2008-09-02T09:08:52","slug":"i-dont-like-cell-phones","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/728","title":{"rendered":"I Don&#039;t Like Cell Phones"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>But it has nothing to do with radiation safety concerns.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/physicsandphysicists.blogspot.com\/2008\/08\/fraud-charges-cast-doubt-on-claims-of.html\">Fraud Charges Cast Doubt on Claims of DNA Damage From Cell Phone Fields<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The only two peer-reviewed scientific papers showing that electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from cell phones can cause DNA breakage are at the center of a misconduct controversy at the Medical University of Vienna (MUV). Critics had argued that the data looked too good to be real, and in May a university investigation agreed, concluding that data in both studies had been fabricated and that the papers should be retracted.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>But it has nothing to do with radiation safety concerns. Fraud Charges Cast Doubt on Claims of DNA Damage From Cell Phone Fields The only two peer-reviewed scientific papers showing that electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from cell phones can cause DNA &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/728\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,35,39,53],"tags":[140,185,229,407],"class_list":["post-728","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-body","category-other-science","category-physics","category-tech","tag-cellphone","tag-dna","tag-fraud","tag-radiation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/728","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=728"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/728\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}