{"id":8818,"date":"2011-06-01T03:00:12","date_gmt":"2011-06-01T08:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/?p=8818"},"modified":"2011-06-01T03:00:12","modified_gmt":"2011-06-01T08:00:12","slug":"science-literacy-in-the-age-of-tornadoes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/8818","title":{"rendered":"Science Literacy in the Age of Tornadoes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/worldsciencefestival.com\/blog\/a_twist_on_climate_change_risk_and_uncertainty\">A Twist on Climate Change, Risk, and Uncertainty<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In this country, we teach kids that science is a collection of hard facts. We teach them that scientists come up with a hypothesis\u2014an idea that might explain some aspect of how the world works. Scientists then test their hypotheses and find out whether it\u2019s correct or not. If it\u2019s correct, then it becomes something that children must memorize. That story is true. But it\u2019s also vastly oversimplified. It gives people the impression that every scientific question can be answered with \u201cyes\u201d or \u201cno.\u201d And if it can\u2019t, then the real answer is probably \u201cno.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That perspective might work okay when you\u2019re sitting in a high school science lab, studying the digestive system of a fetal pig. But it doesn\u2019t work as well in the real world. And it leaves people completely unprepared to understand something like climate change, and how we assess the risks associated with it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I note that &#8220;That story is true&#8221; is correct, but we would be better off if it weren&#8217;t.  That&#8217;s one of the common themes in any discussion in the blogohedron about scientific literacy and science education:  reducing science to a list of facts misrepresents the essence of science and also tends to kill enthusiasm for learning science.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s not to say that facts aren&#8217;t a <em>part<\/em> of science and science literacy.  I think you can distill literacy down to three components \u2014 facts, concepts and procedures.  You can&#8217;t do much without remembering a few facts, and you need to have a basic grasp of some concepts in order to see how those facts fit together.  That&#8217;s part and parcel of any discussion\/vote on what the most important element of scientific literacy \u2014 everyone trots out their favorite &#8220;must know&#8221; tidbit.<\/p>\n<p>Uncertainty is inescapable in science, and you have to account for its presence in interpreting any scientific result, which is a concept that needs to be included in the list of what comprises basic science literacy.  We have to fight the attempts to turn it into a pejorative, since a common implication is that any uncertainty means that we know nothing \u2014 a world is portrayed that&#8217;s black and white, with no tolerance for shades of grey.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Twist on Climate Change, Risk, and Uncertainty In this country, we teach kids that science is a collection of hard facts. We teach them that scientists come up with a hypothesis\u2014an idea that might explain some aspect of how &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/archives\/8818\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8818","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education","category-science-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8818","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8818"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8818\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8818"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8818"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.scienceforums.net\/swansont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8818"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}