Swans on Tea

Physics, tech and humor. Because science and learning are cool, and life's too short not to laugh.
  • Home
  • A very little about me

Be a Journalist, not a Refereee

Published by swansont on October 28, 2011 03:00 am under Journalism

Fighting the “he said, she said” cowardice

The issue of hiding behind the skirts of “getting involved” is something I’ve mentioned before. Letting people spout off (and apply spin) without calling them on their claims shouldn’t count as journalism.

The included link, If “he said, she said” journalism is irretrievably lame, what’s better? is well-worth a read, too, so I’m linking it separately. Good list of reporter guidelines, including some that especially apply to science stories, such as

* There is no such thing as 50/50 balance. There is a truth and we work our damndest to get there.
* Sometimes two viewpoints don’t deserve 50/50 treatment.

3 Comments so far

  1. randomc on October 28th, 2011

    The usual approach of the British press is to mercilessly tear everbody to shreds, and i think that’s the best way; zero deference. The appraoch is noticeable by it’s abscence in science reporting, though.

  2. imatfaal on October 28th, 2011

    Good articles – and I would contradict Random and say that the BBC is in exactly the same quandary. The problem with the moving beyond what NPR and BBC attempt (and sometimes it fails badly) is that we fall into the trap of:
    MY opinion is based on reasoned argument
    YOUR opinion is flawed but can be saved
    HIS opinion is hidebound dogmatism

    The voice of san diego hand book made it quite clear that its agenda (which I approve of wholeheartedly) is acceptable and non-ideological and not dogmatic. But a media organisation having a radical agenda (ie a motivation to promote change) takes it away from being a press/reporting body and change it into an amalgam of press/political body.

    I would prefer the BBC and I guess NPR to remain slightly mealy-mouted and dance around the point whilst avoiding too much editorialising RATHER than they become liberal mirror images of Fox/Sky

  3. swansont on October 28th, 2011

    You can hold everyone to a standard of presenting facts rather than assertions, and do it in a way that is not biased any further than the “facts have a liberal bias” observation that Stephen Colbert has made. That does not have to involve becoming a liberal or conservative pulpit.

Posting your comment.

  • Pages

    • A very little about me
  • Contact

    swansontea (at) scienceforums.net
    Follow Me on Twitter @Swansontea
  • Mark This Page!

    Del.icio.us Digg Reddit StumbleUpon
  • Greatest Hits

    Rolling, Rolling, Rolling
    Crackpot Bingo
    Talk Like a Physicist Day
    Speak the Geek!
    Your Horoscope
    Doomed to Fail
    The Great Deception
    What (not) to Say When You Meet a Physicist
    Socks are Fermions
  • Recent Comments

    • imatfaal on Coordinate Transformation, OMG Edition
    • Phi for All on Coordinate Transformation, OMG Edition
    • LaurieAG on Don’t Worship at the Altar, Because It Doesn’t Exist
    • Hamish Johnston on Charge!
    • Janus on Coordinate Transformation, Fred Astaire Edition
  •  

    May 2013
    S M T W T F S
    « Apr    
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Archives

    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
  • Categories

    • admin
    • Antiscience
    • Art
    • Blog Compendia
    • Body
    • Books
    • Bureaucracy
    • Business
    • Cartoon
    • Conference stories
    • Cool stuff
    • DIY science
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Experiments
    • Food
    • Game
    • Geocaching
    • History
    • Humor
    • Illusions
    • Journalism
    • Lab Stories
    • Language
    • Links
    • Math
    • Metaphysics
    • Misc
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Navy
    • Not Really Science at All
    • Other science
    • peeve
    • photography
    • Photos
    • Physics
    • Politics
    • Quotes
    • Rants
    • Religion
    • Satire
    • Sci-Fi
    • Science-general
    • science-y observation
    • Security
    • Shameless self promotion
    • Sick sick sick
    • Silly
    • Sports
    • Tech
    • The Lab
    • Time
    • TMI
    • Toys
    • trivia
    • TV
    • TYAGFITI
    • Typography
    • Uncategorized
    • Video
    • Weird
    • World Events
    • Writing

Copyright © 2013 Swans on Tea
WordPress Theme based on Light Theme

This blog is protected by Dave's Spam Karma 2: 140883 Spams eaten and counting...

ScienceForums.Net Blog Network | More Blogs | Search Blogs | RSS Logo SFN RSS