Swans on Tea

Physics, tech and humor. Because science and learning are cool, and life's too short not to laugh.
  • Home
  • A very little about me

A Zero-Sum Game

Published by swansont on July 4, 2012 03:00 am under History, Math, Other science

Causes of death: 1900 and 2010

Interesting chart; one can see where we’ve made significant progress in reducing diseases like tuberculosis and making the world safer so that accidents account for fewer deaths per unit population. Fewer deaths implies progress. But an increase is not so clear.

We’re doing great on kidneys, but hearts not so much.

As they might say up in New England, you can’t get there from here. Death is a zero-sum game; sorry if this comes as a surprise, but everybody dies. So if you are going to drastically reduce the number of deaths by one method, then those people will eventually die via another. If you eliminate childhood diseases then average lifespans will increase and those spared will die of something else. I can recall a comment in a medicine-related blog post recently, wherein the commenter claimed that something is wrong with the system because the instances of cancer were increasing, as this chart shows. But given some probability of getting cancer as an adult, you expect that increase: if your chance is 25%, then (roughly speaking) every four childhood deaths prevented should give you an additional adult cancer death. Similarly for heart-related deaths. The chart also doesn’t tell you at what age the deaths occurred (though the decrease in rate implies that death is occurring later, on average). So a heart attack that killed a person at 50 in 1900 might translate into avoiding or surviving that attack in modern times, and finally succumbing to heart disease at 70 or 80. That would not be a lack of progress. You simply can’t glean the necessary details from the graph.

1 Comment so far

  1. J Thomas on July 10th, 2012

    That graph compares the top ten causes of death in 1900 versus the top ten causes in 2010. I’m not sure what you can infer from it, except that the top ten causes now are different, and those ten don’t kill as many people.

    So if we want to reduce death rates, the low-hanging fruit is mostly already picked. Fairly simple methods saved a whole lot of people from infectious pneumonia. There are no big items like that any more except heart disease and cancer, and neither of those look simple at all.

    Suicide is now #10. People decide to die when they don’t want to stay alive The more other causes of death are reduced, the larger that one will rise unless we find ways for more people to have lives that are worth living….

Posting your comment.

  • Pages

    • A very little about me
  • Contact

    swansontea (at) scienceforums.net
    Follow Me on Twitter @Swansontea
  • Mark This Page!

    Del.icio.us Digg Reddit StumbleUpon
  • Greatest Hits

    Rolling, Rolling, Rolling
    Crackpot Bingo
    Talk Like a Physicist Day
    Speak the Geek!
    Your Horoscope
    Doomed to Fail
    The Great Deception
    What (not) to Say When You Meet a Physicist
    Socks are Fermions
  • Recent Comments

    • imatfaal on Not Coming to a Reality TV Show Near You
    • Daedalus on Murder Most Fowl
    • Shelby Munsch on Canada, What Were You Thinking?
    • Uncle Al on Not Coming to a Reality TV Show Near You
    • Phi for All on Murder Most Fowl
  •  

    May 2013
    S M T W T F S
    « Apr    
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Archives

    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
  • Categories

    • admin
    • Antiscience
    • Art
    • Blog Compendia
    • Body
    • Books
    • Bureaucracy
    • Business
    • Cartoon
    • Conference stories
    • Cool stuff
    • DIY science
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Experiments
    • Food
    • Game
    • Geocaching
    • History
    • Humor
    • Illusions
    • Journalism
    • Lab Stories
    • Language
    • Links
    • Math
    • Metaphysics
    • Misc
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Navy
    • Not Really Science at All
    • Other science
    • peeve
    • photography
    • Photos
    • Physics
    • Politics
    • Quotes
    • Rants
    • Religion
    • Satire
    • Sci-Fi
    • Science-general
    • science-y observation
    • Security
    • Shameless self promotion
    • Sick sick sick
    • Silly
    • Sports
    • Tech
    • The Lab
    • Time
    • TMI
    • Toys
    • trivia
    • TV
    • TYAGFITI
    • Typography
    • Uncategorized
    • Video
    • Weird
    • World Events
    • Writing

Copyright © 2013 Swans on Tea
WordPress Theme based on Light Theme

This blog is protected by Dave's Spam Karma 2: 140177 Spams eaten and counting...

ScienceForums.Net Blog Network | More Blogs | Search Blogs | RSS Logo SFN RSS