Swans on Tea

Physics, tech and humor. Because science and learning are cool, and life's too short not to laugh.
  • Home
  • A very little about me

The Gender Bias of Physics

Published by swansont on September 26, 2012 03:00 am under Education, Physics

A couple of posts relating to gender issues in physics that I have run across recently.

Scientists, Your Gender Bias Is Showing

To test scientist’s reactions to men and women with precisely equal qualifications, the researchers did a randomized double-blind study in which academic scientists were given application materials from a student applying for a lab manager position. The substance of the applications were all identical, but sometimes a male name was attached, and sometimes a female name.
Results: female applicants were rated lower than men on the measured scales of competence, hireability, and mentoring (whether the scientist would be willing to mentor this student). Both male and female scientists rated the female applicants lower.

*Sigh* For whatever reason I’m having trouble accessing the actual article, so I don’t know if they show how much worse this might be than in general (assuming that there is gender bias elsewhere, and I’m pretty sure there is), and if there is an age component, i.e. is this more of a problem with older folks, who might soon be removing themselves from being part of the problem. However, that’s a small and faint hope, having observed some of the attitudes displayed in some corners of the internets and in the blogohedron, where presumably the age bias might be in the other direction. I recognize that certain types of change might occur on generational time scales, but it’s 2012, and we (well, women, actually) are still dealing with crap like this.

The second post deals with wondering why women stay, and why they drop out of the physics pipeline.

Why I’m Asking Why

I want to know WHY the percentage of women in physics going down. Right now there is a ton of support for women entering physics. We have conferences and mentorship programs all over the nation. But one crucial voice is missing: the women who dropped out of the physics major, and the women who majored in physics but chose to not go on to graduate school. I write this blog because I want to hear from the women who chose not to continue in physics. They are the ones who can shed the true insight! I also want to hear from women who did continue in physics. What made you pick physics, and what made you stay?

2 Comments so far

  1. Uncle Al on September 26th, 2012

    Blah, blah, blah. Content deleted.

    Not going to entertain this crap.

  2. CharonY on September 26th, 2012

    In the original article they did not find any age bias: “In addition, faculty participants’ scientific field, age, and tenure status had no effect (all P > 0.53). Thus, the bias appears pervasive among faculty and is not limited to a certain
    demographic subgroup.”

    Another interesting point is the starting salary: “The mean starting salary offered the female student, $26,507.94, was significantly lower than that of
    $30,238.10 to the male student [t(124) = 3.42, P < 0.01]"
    That is roughly 12% difference in salary, which is but a tiny bit higher than the gap if the median income in the US is compared (19% difference, according to the US census bureau, 2010 data). So roughly the same ballpark.

Posting your comment.

  • Pages

    • A very little about me
  • Contact

    swansontea (at) scienceforums.net
    Follow Me on Twitter @Swansontea
  • Mark This Page!

    Del.icio.us Digg Reddit StumbleUpon
  • Greatest Hits

    Rolling, Rolling, Rolling
    Crackpot Bingo
    Talk Like a Physicist Day
    Speak the Geek!
    Your Horoscope
    Doomed to Fail
    The Great Deception
    What (not) to Say When You Meet a Physicist
    Socks are Fermions
  • Recent Comments

    • Daedalus on Murder Most Fowl
    • Shelby Munsch on Canada, What Were You Thinking?
    • Uncle Al on Not Coming to a Reality TV Show Near You
    • Phi for All on Murder Most Fowl
    • TransformerRobot on Murder Most Fowl
  •  

    May 2013
    S M T W T F S
    « Apr    
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Archives

    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
  • Categories

    • admin
    • Antiscience
    • Art
    • Blog Compendia
    • Body
    • Books
    • Bureaucracy
    • Business
    • Cartoon
    • Conference stories
    • Cool stuff
    • DIY science
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Experiments
    • Food
    • Game
    • Geocaching
    • History
    • Humor
    • Illusions
    • Journalism
    • Lab Stories
    • Language
    • Links
    • Math
    • Metaphysics
    • Misc
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Navy
    • Not Really Science at All
    • Other science
    • peeve
    • photography
    • Photos
    • Physics
    • Politics
    • Quotes
    • Rants
    • Religion
    • Satire
    • Sci-Fi
    • Science-general
    • science-y observation
    • Security
    • Shameless self promotion
    • Sick sick sick
    • Silly
    • Sports
    • Tech
    • The Lab
    • Time
    • TMI
    • Toys
    • trivia
    • TV
    • TYAGFITI
    • Typography
    • Uncategorized
    • Video
    • Weird
    • World Events
    • Writing

Copyright © 2013 Swans on Tea
WordPress Theme based on Light Theme

This blog is protected by Dave's Spam Karma 2: 139774 Spams eaten and counting...

ScienceForums.Net Blog Network | More Blogs | Search Blogs | RSS Logo SFN RSS