A Snapshot of Foundational Attitudes Toward Quantum Mechanics
I dont get all that caught up in the issues of foundational questions of quantum mechanics; I think, for example, that the interpretations are bridges to understanding, so while I’m happy to cite the Copenhagen interpretation, I’ll also mention many-worlds if that helps — I don’t feel locked into one or the other. (There are some, though, that don’t “feel” right to me and/or seem to have been discredited in some way, and I don’t call upon them. I’m also not nearly as familiar with them). I don’t think you’re going to solve many of these foundational problems unless they aren’t truly foundational, in which case you then have to wrestle with the issues one level down.
Regardless, I think this “snapshot” is interesting, in part because others do spend more time on these issues. Also for the author and respondent comments on many of the questions.
David Kaiser’s book, “How the Hippies Saved Physics” (2011) discusses nonlocality, entanglement, and other interesting quantum issues.