Swans on Tea

Physics, tech and humor. Because science and learning are cool, and life's too short not to laugh.
  • Home
  • A very little about me

What (not) to Say When You Meet a Physicist

Published by swansont on September 16, 2008 03:47 am under Misc, Physics

So I ran across a version of the conversation that most physicists have had over on the Shores of the Dirac Sea (and it’s a new blog, so welcome to the blogohedron!)

The other thing that has happened is that I’ve had many conversations in airplanes where I have realized that people in general do not have a clue as to what physics is all about and why it is so important for humanity. The conversations go like this:

Passenger- Nice to meet you.

DB- Nice to meet you too.

Passenger-So what do you do?

DB-I’m a physicist.

And then the person who is staring at me, if he does not decide that he is too scared, gives me one of the following lines:

1. I see. So what is that good for?
2. So you’re good at sports?
3. That was my worst subject in high school.
4. I never understood physics
5. You must be a genius.
6. I wanted to be a physicist, but I became an engineer instead.

1 is at least addressable with some blurb about basic science being important. And I get to tack on how I sorta help make GPS work.

2 has never come up. Especially if I’m playing sports. (Oh, I used to play hoops and was able to set a pretty mean pick and occasionally get off the ground for a rebound, or pretend to play football or volleyball, but good? Nah.)

The combination of 3 & 4 I’ve heard (not necessarily on airplanes) is “Oh, I hated that when I took it in high school/college” which really takes the starch out of my sails, especially because they start inching (centimetering?) away from you, as if they expected you to start teaching them physics again at any second, like the Monty Python encyclopedia salesman sketch

Burgler!

If I let you in you’ll teach me physics.

No, ma’am, I just want to ransack the flat.

Alright (opens door)

Mind you, I don’t know if you’ve considered the advantages of being able to solve the ballistic pendulum problem on your own.

Anyway, what’s up with the “I hated physics” response? I generally don’t denigrate anyone else’s profession when I first meet them. Well, unless they’re a lawyer.

5 is a toughie. I don’t know how to respond to “You must be smart/a genius!”

Options:
“And handsome, too.” But they don’t know me, and might not appreciate my sense of humor.
“Why yes. Yes, I am. I am incredibly smart.” As with the previous answer, it comes off as arrogant if they miss the signs that it’s humor. But if you go the opposite direction with “No, not really” it could be even worse, because if you’re not really smart and still understand physics, where are they in the grand scheme of things? It’s a lose-lose situation. And they still have that student-in-the-headlights look of someone afraid I’ll start lecturing. No, I think you have to thank them for the compliment and quickly change the subject.

6 — I’ve never met an engineer who told me that. Several of them confided that they didn’t understand why they needed to take physics, which scares the socks off me. I have to refrain from asking that subset if they worked on the Tacoma Narrows bridge.

6 Comments so far

  1. Joerg on September 18th, 2008

    If you’re on a plane, I think a straight answer to (1) would be to wave around and explain why a plane flies?

  2. Ryan on September 23rd, 2008

    My approach to (5) is to simply say, “physics is a lot easier when you’re really interested in it.” It has the benefit of avoiding the appearance of arrogance while being true.

  3. siddharth on October 3rd, 2008

    Hmm.. I guess I’d be in the last category – I’m in EE though. Not device physics side though I’m leaning that way mind you and if I do take it up it would mostly be for some interesting applications on the cassimir effect rather than anything else. Currently though I’m working on neural networks implementing them and such like – maybe I’ll get to do neuromorphic.

    Ok enough off topic – I actually would have loved to do physics but I do know that funding in physics is more difficult than EE, and that if I’d have taken physics I would have been all idealistic and done the sort of theoretical work that would leave me hungry and without a house – but that’s just me.

  4. Paul Murray on November 5th, 2008

    Good job you never sat next to me. I’d have asked you to explain bra-ket notation. I tried to follow the explanation on Wikipedia, but you just wind up going around in circles.

  5. Jorg on November 15th, 2008

    Ha ha! Brilliant. Believe me, I have it worse, as an astronomer. there is nothing that “takes the starch out of my sails” as effectively as some woman I am trying to chat up in a bar mistaking what I do for astrology. Not only do I lose all interest, but usually have to walk away rather quickly before succumbing to the temptation of bashing her over the head…;)

  6. swansont on November 15th, 2008

    Try telling her you’re a horologist without getting slapped.

Posting your comment.

  • Pages

    • A very little about me
  • Contact

    swansontea (at) scienceforums.net
    Follow Me on Twitter @Swansontea
  • Mark This Page!

    Del.icio.us Digg Reddit StumbleUpon
  • Greatest Hits

    Rolling, Rolling, Rolling
    Crackpot Bingo
    Talk Like a Physicist Day
    Speak the Geek!
    Your Horoscope
    Doomed to Fail
    The Great Deception
    What (not) to Say When You Meet a Physicist
    Socks are Fermions
  • Recent Comments

    • Daedalus on Murder Most Fowl
    • Shelby Munsch on Canada, What Were You Thinking?
    • Uncle Al on Not Coming to a Reality TV Show Near You
    • Phi for All on Murder Most Fowl
    • TransformerRobot on Murder Most Fowl
  •  

    May 2013
    S M T W T F S
    « Apr    
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Archives

    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
  • Categories

    • admin
    • Antiscience
    • Art
    • Blog Compendia
    • Body
    • Books
    • Bureaucracy
    • Business
    • Cartoon
    • Conference stories
    • Cool stuff
    • DIY science
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Experiments
    • Food
    • Game
    • Geocaching
    • History
    • Humor
    • Illusions
    • Journalism
    • Lab Stories
    • Language
    • Links
    • Math
    • Metaphysics
    • Misc
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Navy
    • Not Really Science at All
    • Other science
    • peeve
    • photography
    • Photos
    • Physics
    • Politics
    • Quotes
    • Rants
    • Religion
    • Satire
    • Sci-Fi
    • Science-general
    • science-y observation
    • Security
    • Shameless self promotion
    • Sick sick sick
    • Silly
    • Sports
    • Tech
    • The Lab
    • Time
    • TMI
    • Toys
    • trivia
    • TV
    • TYAGFITI
    • Typography
    • Uncategorized
    • Video
    • Weird
    • World Events
    • Writing

Copyright © 2013 Swans on Tea
WordPress Theme based on Light Theme

This blog is protected by Dave's Spam Karma 2: 139883 Spams eaten and counting...

ScienceForums.Net Blog Network | More Blogs | Search Blogs | RSS Logo SFN RSS