swans on tea

Just another SFN Blogs site
  • Home
  • A very little about me
  • Sample Page

Crackpot Bingo

Published by swansont on May 11, 2008 10:25 am under Antiscience, Silly

It happens in science blog comments, and more so in discussion boards where you get some crank with their pet theory of some science subdiscipline, and how it’s the new paradigm ready to emerge and topple the orthodoxy. And it’s almost formulaic like a Hardy Boys mystery (or even a Robert Ludlum novel) with the same arguments cropping up in different combinations. Read several in a row and the commonalities jump out at you.

Hmmm. A finite set of arguments, appearing seemingly at random. Sounds like bingo to me!
Here are the major points, many of which are shamelessly cribbed from the crackpot index

Strawman – use of the strawman fallacy
Unbelievable — use of the argument from incredulity fallacy (I don’t understand, therefore it’s wrong)
Gedanken — use of a thought experiment to debunk a theory or actual experiment
ALLCAPS — extensive use of ALLCAPS or large font
Galileo — as in, comparing themself favorably (i.e. persecuted)
Einstein — as in, comparing themself favorably (i.e. I am the next one)
Nobel — claiming they will win one
School — listing degrees and/or schools attended
Dropout — usually a proud declaration
Many years — how long they’ve worked on their theory
Prize — offer a prize to anyone debunking their work
Terminology — new terms or acronyms
Particles — new particles proposed (Tachyons don’t count)
Interaction — a new interaction is proposed
Eponym — naming something of their work after themselves
Math — admitting to be unable to do it or doing it horribly
Theory — as in, “it’s only a theory” argument to dismiss accepted science
Metaphysics — the work explains “why” or what some phenomenon “really is”
Censorship — complaints about work being censored
Rue — “you’ll rue the day you ignored me” or similar warning
Religion — claiming science is a religion
Priest/Bible — scientists are high priests, or some work is the science bible
Gifs — animated, very pretty, meaningless
Graphs — must have unlabeled axes or be otherwise incomprehensible
See? — claiming the model explains/predicts many phenomena, but without actually presenting evidence
Huh? — befuddlement over lack of instant acceptance of new paradigm
We — the royal we; “we don’t understand X” applied to a well-understood issue
You — “You don’t understand X” directed toward an individual with significant experience in the field
Predicts — model predicts phenomena that have never been observed, but should have been
Turtles — all the way down: all of physics is due to one fundamental particle
Quotes — supports position by selective quoting
Like — argument by analogy
Topology — use of mobius strip or klein bottle in argument
Mum — won’t divulge details for fear of idea being stolen
Polly — simple repetition of claims, unchanged, after being debunked
——
Indignation — at being asked for evidence or other corroboration (added 5/11)

I’ll add more if worthy ones are suggested.

Card generator available here

9 Comments so far

  1. ecoli on May 11th, 2008

    that’s amazing

  2. Uncle Al on May 11th, 2008

    Empirical validation separates crackpots from visionaries. If it is testable and would not contradict prior observation, you look. The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance but the illusion of knowledge. Reality is not a peer vote. “Autoritätsdusel ist der größte Feind der Wahrheit,” Albert Einstein, 1901; then quantum mechanics in the 1920s.

    General Relativity is trivially falsifiable without contradiction. SR becomes GR by postulating the Equivalence Principle. Present two lumps that locally vacuum free fall along non-parallel trajectories and GR is reduced to a heuristic. The lab bench EP gold standard is the Eötvös experiment with 5×10^(-14) difference/average sensitivity. All compositions of matter (including massive relativistic and quantum mechanical distortions of PSR J0737-3039A/B) obey GR and validate the EP. So what? Gravitation is mass configuration. Are chemically identical left and right shoes an EP parity violation?

    (Parity violating massed sectors are neither required nor forbidden in metric-affine, Einstein-Cartan, teleparallel, and Riemannian geometry gravitations. Ashtekar has a parity violating term with the Immirzi coefficient. Theory sypporting EP parity violation is already in place.)

    230 periodic 3-D crystallographic space groups. 65 Sohncke space groups can contain chiral contents. 11 pairs of Sohncke space groups are enantiomorphs (opposite shoes) – the space groups themselves are chiral independent of the contents. Enantiomorphic space groups P3(1)21 and P3(2)21 (quartz group) calculate as maximally parity divergent. Do the opposite parity atomic mass distributions of enantiomorphic single crystal alpha-quartz test masses measurably violate the Equivalence Principle in a parity Eötvös experiment? Somebody should look. It’s slick crackpottery… unless it works. Validation promotes it to discovery.

    (There is no parity Nordtvedt effect re lunar laser ranging. Chiral L-amino acids in protein, chiral D-sugars naturally, then meat and wood cancel. All non-life chiral materials are spontaneous racemic mixtures.)

  3. Klaynos on May 12th, 2008

    I am so very very happy that we’ve got these cards…. I’m going to start playing asap!

  4. symmetry breaking » Blog Archive » Time to play crackpot bingo! on May 13th, 2008

    […] useless? Wrong! Over at Swans on Tea, Tom Swanson mines them for gold, creating a new game called Crackpot Bingo. In place of the traditional numbers–B22, G3–his cards feature terms from the crackpot […]

  5. Travis on May 14th, 2008

    I suggest “Blinders” for having a bibliography that contains only references to their own papers, and those of Einstein.

  6. Tom Swanson’s Crackpot Bingo on May 15th, 2008

    […] Continue reading at the original site […]

  7. school of metaphysics on May 22nd, 2008

    […] […]

  8. A New Game… « Twisted One 151’s Weblog on May 25th, 2008

    […] A New Game… Tom Swanson of Swans on Tea has a new game: Crackpot Bingo. […]

  9. Vacuum Flowers | Isotropic on December 1st, 2008

    […] more entertaining is the collection of comments, which reminded me of Swans on Tea’s Crackpot Bingo which I’d run across a little bit earlier: It happens in science blog comments, and more so […]

Posting your comment.

  • Recent Posts

    • When Does the Decade End?
    • This is the Hardest Job a Manager Has …
    • 5 Things You Should Know About Light
    • See Spot "Run"
    • The System Works
  • Recent Comments

    • Joey Cook on One Ringy-Dingy, Two Ringy-Dingy
    • Science Fanatic on Talk Like a Physicist Day
    • Chris Gould on Brian Cox is Full of **it
    • LaurieAG on Inmates Running the Asylum
    • Uncle Al on Curious About Curies
  • Archives

    • December 2019
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
  • Categories

    • admin
    • Antiscience
    • Art
    • Blog Compendia
    • Blogging
    • Body
    • Books
    • Bureaucracy
    • Business
    • Cartoon
    • Conference stories
    • Cool stuff
    • DIY science
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Experiments
    • Food
    • Game
    • Geocaching
    • History
    • Humor
    • Illusions
    • Journalism
    • Lab Stories
    • Language
    • Links
    • Math
    • Metaphysics
    • Misc
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Navy
    • Not Really Science at All
    • Other science
    • peeve
    • photography
    • Photos
    • Physics
    • Politics
    • Quotes
    • Rants
    • Religion
    • Satire
    • Sci-Fi
    • Science-general
    • science-y observation
    • Security
    • Shameless self promotion
    • Sick sick sick
    • Silly
    • Sports
    • Tech
    • The Lab
    • Thermal IR
    • Time
    • TMI
    • Toys
    • trivia
    • TV
    • TYAGFITI
    • Typography
    • Uncategorized
    • Video
    • Weird
    • World Events
    • Writing
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2023 swans on tea
WordPress Theme based on Light Theme