The Politics of Physics. Or is it The Physics of Politics?

McCain’s Cosmological Breakthrough: Unreality Is Expanding

Gov. Sarah Palin, campaigning, she said, in “real America,” which apparently includes part of North Carolina, Rep. Michelle Bachmann, calling for a media investigation to determine whether Americans are real or not, and today, McCain all-around best surrogate Nancy Pfotenhauer (pronounced — Foe-Ten-How-er, like proton power), said that parts of the state of Virginia, heretofore universally assumed to be in America, were not, in fact, in the country.

Extra dimensions can apparently account for the “unreal America”

I find this especially interesting, because, according to the article, I live in the place that is “real America” but is in danger of becoming “unreal” when we collapse the wave function in November.

If you think that’s special, then think about this. Pfotenhauer said that she lives in a place called Oakton, Va. Oakton is located in Fairfax County. Pfotenhauer implied that the country was part of “real America” because it was open to the possibility of electing John McCain. Here’s the problem: Fairfax County, like its neighbors, are in the process of turning colors. (We can detect this with a special version of a mass spectrometer called a “ballot box.”)

Heh. Oakton’s about 8 miles away. I’ve never noticed any changes when I’ve driven in that direction.

via physics and physicists

—————

Since we’re on the topic of politics anyway, check out Ian’s Lessons from the Cold War: understanding ideologies over at Quantum Moxie.

I believe the hatred that has slowly taken the place of respectful disagreement between the “left” and “right” has its origins in the inability of either side to comprehend the other side’s motivation. Some might say it is an unwillingness rather than an inability and the truth is likely a mixture of both. But, quite clearly, there are times when there is simply an inability, for whatever reason, to grasp a motivating principle if it is so entirely foreign to us.

I certainly have observed people from both sides that simply hate the other side, no matter what. Which is really dangerous, because then nobody will listen to each other, but is also self-defeating, because you become a hypocrite for decrying behavior when the opponent does it, but not when your friend does.

I ran across an example just today, in what was an otherwise much more reasonable discussion about why an electrical transmission project in California is a bad idea, and an entreaty to do something about it if you live there.

You can also, if you choose, point out that Arnold has a good record on environmental issues (which, I am pained to report, he really does, for a Republican) and that he has a chance to keep that record intact here.

Why does it pain you to report this? It’s almost as if the poster wants to hate him, and is upset that this is preventing him from doing so. This is part of the problem outlined above.

——————

And finally, a few tidbits

This resonated with me in the recent endorsements of Obama by the Chicago Tribune

We know first-hand that Obama seeks out and listens carefully and respectfully to people who disagree with him.

This would be a welcome change from the current administration.

And, finally, Yes

0 thoughts on “The Politics of Physics. Or is it The Physics of Politics?

  1. Speaking of quantum America, I wonder if it has something to do with the uncertainty principle that Americans never know where other countries are.

  2. Speaking of quantum America, I wonder if it has something to do with the uncertainty principle that Americans never know where other countries are.

    You’re probably giving us too much credit there.

    (Thanks for the link, by the way. Glad to know I’m not simply talking – or writing – to myself.)

  3. Really, you’ve heard HATE coming from the left? Since Bush was inaugurated I’ve been told by the highest officials of our country that I’m a traitor, anti-american and that I must love Sadam Hussain – the whole “you’re either with us or against us”. Please don’t paint a false dichotomy here. The right now legally advocates torture, restriction of rights, indefinite detention of citizens, and more war – and STILL I haven’t heard the leaders of the left call them traitors, impune their patriotism or call them terrorists (and the they might actually objectively fit the criteria).

    Hmmmm.