Category Archives: General

Thoughts about Research – a list of interesting quotes

logo

photo

Professor Piotr Pragacz, a mathematician working in the area of algebraic geometry here at IMPAN, has collected a few quotes on mathematics and science a little more generally.

Some of my favorites listed include

Nicolaus Copernicus: “Mathematics is written for mathematicians.”

Godfrey H. Hardy: “Young men should prove theorems, old men should write books.”

Albert Einstein: “The important thing is not to stop questioning; curiosity has its own reason for existing.”

David Hibert: “One can measure the importance of a scientific work by the number of earlier publications rendered superfluous by it.”

Henri Poincaré: “The scientist does not study nature because it is useful to do so. He studies it because he takes pleasure in it, and he takes pleasure in it because it is beautiful.”

And my personal favorite

Winston Churchill: “Success consists of going from failure
to failure without loss of enthusiasm. ”

Follow the link below for many more quotes.

Link
Thoughts About Research

Advancing women in mathematics: good practice in UK university departments

lms

The London Mathematical Societry launched its report Advancing women in mathematics: good practice in UK university departments at the House of Commons on 27th February.

The LMS is concerned about the loss of women from mathematics, particularly at the higher levels of research and teaching, and at the missed opportunities that this represents. Through its Women in Mathematics Committee it established a Good Practice Scheme and supporting departments participated in a benchmarking survey which led to this report.

http://lms.ac.uk/news-entry/26022013-1401/house-commons-launch-good-practice-report

The report is avaliable here (opend PDF)

Link
House of Commons Launch of Good Practice Report (LMS)

The London Mathematical Society response to inquiry on Open Acces

lms
The London Mathematical Society has responded to the House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee inquiry into open access publishing. The response can be found below.

We have long been concerned about the threat to our Society from the implementation of open access policies which seek to reduce the level of library sales by making the content of journals available to readers through alternative routes.

The Institute of Physics has also responded, follow the link below.

Link
RESPONSE FROM THE LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY (opens PDF)

Institute of Physics response to a House of Lords Science and Technology Committee inquiry (opens PDF)

Take that Einstein…I mean, take that cranks!

einstein

… all of the available constraints on the validity of the founding principles of SR and GR have so far failed to crack any faults in these century-old theories, which thus remains the standard against all competitors so far.

Orfeu Bertolami and Jorge Páramos in [1]

I like the above quote. It is rather an inescapable that Einsteinian relativity works well.

Objections to relativity
I posted, about a year ago now, on the experimental status of Einsteinian relativity, you can read it here.

Whatever the faults with general and special relativity, philosophical or real, today we have no other theory of space, time and gravity that has the experimental success of Einstein’s theories.

Most of the “objections” to special and general relativity stem from not really understanding what the theory is saying, or indeed what a theory really is. Analogies and popular science accounts seem to also be the root of a lot of misunderstandings.

Other good references on the experimental status of relativity include [2,3,4].

The failings of general relativity
It is not true that anyone really expects general relativity to be the final say on gravity. The issues as they stand include:

  • The existence of singularities
  • The cosmological constant problem
  • Incompatibility with standard quantisation methods
  • Dark energy

All these problems only really tell us that general relativity is not a complete theory in the sense that there is physics that it cannot accurately explain.  This is not grounds for dismissing general relativity as it is a very accurate model of gravity for a huge range of phenomena.

 

References
[1] Orfeu Bertolami and Jorge Páramos, The experimental status of Special and General Relativity, arXiv:1212.2177v1 [gr-qc]

[2]Orfeu Bertolami, Jorge Páramos, and Slava G. Turyshev. General theory of relativity: Will it survive the next decade? In Lasers, Clocks, and Drag-Free: Technologies for Future Exploration in Space and Tests of Gravity. Springer Verlag, 2006; gr-qc/0602016.

[3]Clifford M. Will. The confrontation between general relativity and experiment. Living Reviews in Relativity, 9(3), 2006.

[4]Will, Clifford M. (2006). Was Einstein Right? Testing Relativity at the Centenary. Annalen der Physik 15: 19–33

Some more IFS fractals

IFS

Above is another iterated function system fractal my wife and I created. You can see the self-similarity of the “swirls” clearly. We are both pleased with this one.

IFS

This one has a rather organic shape. You can see that this one consists of overlapping spirals and almost a ghostly appearance.

IFS

The above is similar to the first IFS system fractal we created together. It has a spongy-organic look to it.

You can find other IFS fractals we have created here and here. We may post more in the future.

Professor Dame Jocelyn Bell Burnell is one of the UK’s most powerful women.

BBC Radio 4’s Woman’s Hour announced its list of the 100 most powerful women in the UK on Tuesday 12 February. The list included a number of other high profile scientists and engineers including Professor Bell Burnell.

prof
Prof S Jocelyn Bell Burnell

We’re delighted to see Jocelyn, joined by a range of extraordinary female scientists and engineers, in this inaugural power list. Jocelyn’s contribution to research and as an inspiring figurehead and role model in the fight to overcome gender disparities in science make her a very deserving choice.

Professor Sir Peter Knight, President of IOP

Pulsars
Prof. Bell Burnell is credited with the discovery of the first radio pulsar (PSR B1919+21), while a postgraduate student under the supervision of Antony Hewish. Interestingly, the regular radio signal detected in 1967 that lead to the discovery of the first pulsar was given the designation LGM-1. That stands for “little green men”. The signal was so regular it was initially thought it could not be natural!

We did not really believe that we had picked up signals from another civilization, but obviously the idea had crossed our minds and we had no proof that it was an entirely natural radio emission. It is an interesting problem – if one thinks one may have detected life elsewhere in the universe how does one announce the results responsibly? Who does one tell first?

S. Jocelyn Bell Burnell. “Little Green Men, White Dwarfs or Pulsars?”. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, vol. 302, pages 685-689, Dec., 1977

It took the powerful mind of Fred Hoyle to realise that these signals came from neutron stars with strong magnetic fields.

Controversially, she was not a co-recipient of the 1974 Nobel Prize for Physics along side Antony Hewish and Martin Ryle, which was awarded for pulsar research.

Academic activities
Prof. Bell Burnell was president of the Royal Astronomical Society from 2002-2004 and president of the Institute of Physics from October 2008 until October 2010. She was also interim president following the death of her successor, Marshall Stoneham, in early 2011.

Links
Past-president makes Woman’s Hour power list IOP News

The power list BBC Radio 4’s Woman’s Hour

Quantum Life: How Physics Can Revolutionise Biology.

Prof. Jim Al-Khalili, an expert on nuclear physics, spoke at the Royal Institution about the role of quantum physics in biology. The video is embedded below.

[youtube:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwgQVZju1ZM&feature=player_embedded]

I know that Prof. Al-Khalili is working on the interface of quantum mechanics and biology.

Recently I have become more interested in a new field called quantum biology, where we are gathering evidence for biological phenomena at the cellular level that seem to work according to the strange rules of quantum mechanics. My interest (and I have a great grad student working with me on this at the moment) is in modelling mathematically genetic mutations in DNA that seem to take place because of a quantum mechanism called quantum tunneling. In fact, this whole area is the subject of my next book that I am currently working on.

From An interview with Jim Al-Khalili