The Induced conductor net problem could be solved if we can determine the induced voltage in part of the circuit. But is it possible that a voltage exist in no-loop wire? Let us see what the induced voltage is in a circular loop formed with 4 segments separated by resistors

Please read the article at
Non-loop induced voltage problem
http://pengkuanem.blogspot.com/2015/03/non-loop-induced-voltage-problem.html

or
https://www.academia.edu/11701041/Non-loop_induced_voltage_problem

pdf or word

My article Coil and resistor induction paradox shows that the potential energy of electrons in an induced coil is not correctly described by Faraday’s law. This is illustrated by Figure 1 in which a circular circuit with a resistor A is induced in a magnetic field; the resistance of the wire P is negligible. The inconsistency is that the electric field in the conductor wire P is zero and the moving electrons cannot collect energy. The present article exposes another problem: finding the potential in induced circuit with multiple resistor and branches.

Please read the article at
Induced conductor net problem
http://pengkuanem.blogspot.com/2015/03/induced-conductor-net-problem.html

or
https://www.academia.edu/11470407/Induced_conductor_net_problem

pdf or word

In my article Faraday’s Law Paradox, I have explained that in a magnetically induced coil the line integral of electric field is paradoxically zero in contraction with Faraday’s law. This paradox has aroused a long discussion which also reveals that the air gap between the coil’s terminals confused the understanding of the paradox. The closed coil below makes this paradox sharper. I will give my solution to this paradox.

Please read the article at

Coil and resistor induction paradox pdf or word

http://pengkuanem.blogspot.com/2015/02/coil-and-resistor-induction-paradox.html

or
https://www.academia.edu/11113117/Coil_and_resistor_induction_paradox

In my research on electromagnetism, I have understood that magnetism is forces created by moving charges and felt by moving charges. An electric current is a model of continuous flow of uncountable electrons moving in the same direction. This scheme seems benign but when I applied it to the Universe, I find in it a surprisingly judicious approach to solve the mystery of dark matter.

Please read the article at
Magnetism and dark matter http://pengkuanem.blogspot.com/2015/01/magnetism-and-dark-matter.html
or
https://www.academia.edu/10183169/Magnetism_and_dark_matter

Magnetism and dark matter pdf or word

In order to solve the mystery presented by my experiment Tangential EMF experiment that shows the lighting of LEDs when a coil rotates tangentially near a magnet, Jos Bergervoet proposed that the lighting may be caused by a tilt of the coil. Effectively, if the coil is tilted at an angle with respect to the direction of the magnetic field B, it will enter the area enclosed by the coil and, when rotating, the flux will vary and induce a voltage in the coil.

Please read the article at
Is the tangential EMF due to a tilt of the coil? http://pengkuanem.blogspot.com/2014/12/is-tangential-emf-due-to-tilt-of-coil.html
or https://www.academia.edu/9826402/Is_the_tangential_EMF_due_to_a_tilt_of_the_coil

Is the tangential EMF due to a tilt of the coil pdf or word with video

Imagine a plane coil with zero magnetic flux through it. When it rotates in its plane, will an EMF be generated? Everybody would say no. Due to Faraday’s law, no EMF could exist in a coil if the enclosed magnetic flux does not change. Then, how can you explain the experiment in this video?

Please read the article at
Tangential EMF experiment http://pengkuanem.blogspot.com/2014/12/tangential-emf-experiment.html
or https://www.academia.edu/9684360/Tangential_EMF_experiment

Tangential EMF experiment pdf or word with video

I have published many articles indicating that the Lorentz force law is flawed. In order to help people to better understand my work, I make a brief guide through the 5 intuitive paradoxes, 2 analytic computations, 3 numerical computations and 7 experiments, all of which are examples of the flaw of the Lorentz force law. The corrected magnetic force law that I propose is identical to the Lorentz force law for closed coils but respects Newton’s third law.

Please read the article at
Explanatory summary for my studies about the Lorentz force law pdf or word

Explanatory summary for my studies about the Lorentz force law http://pengkuanem.blogspot.com/2014/11/explanatory-summary-for-my-studies.html
or https://www.academia.edu/9529415/Explanatory_summary_for_my_studies_about_the_Lorentz_force_law

To my previous proofs of the inconsistency of the Lorentz force law some have objected with dubious arguments such as: magnetic force on displacement current, magnetic force inside a magnetic shield. Also, my mathematical demonstrations using triangular coils are although exact but too hard to follow. So, I propose a much more intuitive and simpler counter-example here, a 3D folded rectangular coil, Figure 1. Figure 2 is the right view showing the vertical sides BC and CD.

Please read the article at
Self force of a 3D coil http://pengkuanem.blogspot.com/2014/11/self-force-of-3d-coil.html
or Self force of a 3D coil https://www.academia.edu/9413326/Self_force_of_a_3D_coil

Self force of a 3D coil pdf or word

For the last 2 years, I have been publishing theoretical and experimental studies showing inconsistencies of the Lorentz force law due to violation of Newton’s third law. I proposed a corrected magnetic force law to express magnetic force behavior that the Lorentz force cannot explain.

Since the corrected magnetic force law gives the same value for the total magnetic force between 2 coils as the Lorentz force law but in addition respects Newton’s third law for current elements, I thought that it described correctly magnetic force and tried to prove this by experiment. I planned 2 experiments to show firstly that the force between perpendicular currents was zero and secondly the magnetic force tangential to current is not zero.

But against my expectation, the first experiment was a blatant Fail of the perpendicular action experiment. The experiment showed that the magnetic force between perpendicular current elements, the perpendicular action, existed.

Obviously something is missing in my law. I have been searching for this something during the whole last year and finally figured out how magnetic force arises between perpendicular currents while respecting Newton’s third law. So I have redone this experiment and taken it in video.

Please read the article at
Perpendicular action experiment with a long rectangular coil http://pengkuanem.blogspot.com/2014/03/perpendicular-action-experiment-with.html
or Document word with the video integrated https://www.academia.edu/6556384/Perpendicular_action_experiment_with_a_long_rectangular_coil

Perpendicular action experiment with a long rectangular coil pdf
or document word with the video integrated

My experiment Circular motor driven by tangential magnetic force showed tangential magnetic force making a circular coil rotate. Someone has objected that the particular field of the quadripole magnet was confusing. So, I made a motor with regular magnets to show that tangential force exists generally in all kind of magnetic field.

Please read the article at
Tangential force motor with regular magnets http://pengkuanem.blogspot.com/2014/03/tangential-force-motor-with-regular.html
or document word with the video integrated https://www.academia.edu/6395827/Tangential_force_motor_with_regular_magnets

Tangential force motor with regular magnets pdf or document word with the video integrated