… And it Comes Out Here

Giving Light a Spin

Ordinary, unpolarized light can be thought of as an equal mixture of clockwise- and counterclockwise-rotating, circularly polarized waves. To create pure, circularly polarized light, a filter can absorb one polarization state and let the other pass through. Such filters are not hard to make, but they are inefficient, since half of the initial light is lost. Liquid crystals are known to emit circularly polarized light, and light from certain semiconductors can become polarized when a magnetic field is used [1]. But these systems are rather large and inflexible in their design.

True, but this ignores lasers which emit linearly polarized light, which can be circularly polarized with a quarter-wave retarder. But there are probably advantages to having it all as a monolithic compact system.

(I also wonder what will happen when someone notices that this system uses a swastika shape, which from a technology standpoint is not particularly surprising — you need a chiral shape, and straight lines are generally the easiest to etch (it has to be a pattern supported by the crystal structure of the material). But given the conservapedia invent-a-furor over relativity, who knows what will happen in the blogohedron?)

Golden Gate Diamond Anniversary

Buzz Blog has a post up about the physics of the Golden Gate Bridge. They mention the thermal effects, which I had blogged about this past summer. There is also now a demonstration of the vibrational modes, using a 1/500 scale model:

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

There’s also a puzzle at the Buzz Blog link

This quite possibly could be the best business card I have ever seen, because it is not just a cleverly designed graphic, it’s a puzzle: although the diameter of this circle on the card is smaller than that of a quarter, there is a way to get the quarter through the hole. It’s an enigma, get it? Can you figure it out?

There is a way of solving it which does not involve immersing the quarter in liquid nitrogen. (or any other thermal solution)

via Zz

Sarah McLachlan Science

A Mystery: Why Can’t We Walk Straight?

More like building a mystery*. Perhaps I am missing something, but I’m having a hard time understanding the “mystery” behind this. From a physics standpoint, we know that a moving object will travel at constant speed in a straight line if and only if there is no net force acting on it. Forces along that path will change the speed, so we don’t have to worry about that, and vertical forces can be ignored, since we aren’t going to start levitating or submersing ourselves in the ground. Which leaves us with the last component, which is perpendicular to the path. An acceleration perpendicular to the path gives you — ta da — circular motion. Physics 101.

I’m guessing the problem is in the assumption that the human brain could remove all biases in our locomotion and produce only forces along the direction of travel, without visual cues for feedback. Why would you assume that to be true? The surprise might be that there are biases rather than fluctuations, which would lead to a random walk (in the perpendicular component), but that’s still not a straight line. Assuming no noise processes at all is just naive.

*no data on if this effect holds while wearing sandals in the snow

Spot Welding Has Nothing to Do with Dogs

Cocktail Party Physics: welding: a matter of life and death.

The arc works on the same principle as spark plugs: electrons build up on the tip of the electrode. Charges of the same type want to be as far as possible from each other, but there’s only so much space on the tip for the charges to sit. When the electrons reach a critical concentration, they are so repulsed by each other that they jump through the air gap to get away from each other. Once in the metal that you’re trying to join, the electrons are free to move around and maximize their distance from each other.

I learned a little about how to arc weld when I was young — my neighbor had a machine, and many odd bits of iron got welded together for practice.

Impossible Songs

That post about Science on the Simpsons made me think about science in music. More specifically, science that’s wrong in song. This is actual problematic physics, not some mention of fantasy or fiction, in which the rules of science might not apply. Here are a few I can think of off the top of my iPod:

 

Creedence Clearwater Revival, Up Around the Bend

You can ponder perpetual motion

OK, so pondering perpetual motion may not be impossible, but is ultimately fruitless

 

Jefferson Starship, Girl With the Hungry Eyes

I like to move at the speed of light
Albert says I can’t, but I can

 

B-52s, Planet Claire

She drove a Plymouth Satellite
Faster than the speed of light

 

Barenaked Ladies, It’s All Been Done

The whole song is about immortality

 

A Google search shows there are a lot of lyrics using speed of light as a literary device, like “living at the speed of light,” but I don’t think those count. But I did find this one:

Coldplay, Speed of Sound

Look up, I look up at night,
Planets are moving at the speed of light.

 

Feel free to add more in the comments.

So This Virgin Was Explaining Sex to Me …

Horrible Article On Becoming A Physicist

This person by the name of “Timothy Sexton” (BA in English) somehow thought that he could write an article titled “How to Become a Physicist and What to Expect when You Become One“. Now, before we examine his article, tell me something. What are the chances that someone who has never obtained a degree in physics, and has never worked in physics, would know well enough what one needs to do to become a physics, and then know what to expect when one becomes a physicist?

Thtuck! Thtuck!

You either need to learn about the concepts of thermodynamics, or you can watch A Christmas Story

Boy’s Tongue Stuck to Frozen Pole After ‘Christmas Story’ Dare

You’ve seen this scene before — every Christmas.

An 8-year-old Oklahoma boy got his tongue stuck on a frozen stop sign pole after his brother dared him to lick it.

No mention of an escalation from a double-dog to a triple-dog dare, however.