Let's Teach Adults, Too

How to Teach a Child to Argue

And let’s face it: Our culture has lost the ability to usefully disagree. Most Americans seem to avoid argument. But this has produced passive aggression and groupthink in the office, red and blue states, and families unable to discuss things as simple as what to watch on television. Rhetoric doesn’t turn kids into back-sassers; it makes them think about other points of view.

I had long equated arguing with fighting, but in rhetoric they are very different things. An argument is good; a fight is not. Whereas the goal of a fight is to dominate your opponent, in an argument you succeed when you bring your audience over to your side. A dispute over territory in the backseat of a car qualifies as an argument, for example, in the unlikely event that one child attempts to persuade his audience rather than slug it.

Teaching kids how to argue properly presumes that the parents know how to argue, which I don’t think is generally the case. But that’s a rant for another post.

I Don't Know the Answer, but Neither Do You

Unqualified Offerings: A lot of ignorance needn’t stop you from offering contradictory theories

I have no particular opinion on why there is a gender gap in certain fields of science. I have a lot of skepticism for various theories offered, but I have no theory of my own. And it isn’t just because it’s a hot potato issue where it would be easy to put a foot in my mouth. I really, honestly, find many explanations wanting.

The thing that gets me about this whole discussion is the unscientific nature of a lot of the analysis, or lack thereof (there’s an “if you disagree you must be a misogynist!” crowd that sometimes shows up in places and shouts down any hope of actual discussion), because bad arguments make me cringe, and these are bad arguments. Most of the explanations that are proffered have stark counterexamples, either within STEM areas or in the business world, that show the explanation to be either wrong or incomplete. One thing not mentioned in the link is the disregard for the basic math conundrum of the Garrison Keillor effect— if you have overrepresentation in some areas, it’s simply impossible to simultaneously have equity in all the rest.

Spicing it Up

Green Eggs and Toast

Changing standard storytelling as an exercise in challenging kids. Plus, it’s fun. I’ve done these and similar things with my nieces. The fill-in-the-last-word is something I learned from someone with a background in child development, and the replace-a-word I do just because I love kids’ sense of the absurd (and finding the line where pretending becomes just silly). Changing the story has its dangers, though — it can be upsetting if you aren’t doing it right and the child isn’t in the mood for it.

Uncle’s tip: Always negotiate how many time you’re expected to read the book before you start. They’re minors and contracts aren’t legally binding, but it’s some leverage, at least. You get tired of reading the book long before they tire of hearing it … again.

via

Getting Your Scorecard

Wrong Tomorrow

When someone makes a prediction, people post it to the site along with a brief description and a URL. We monitor it and change its status to true or false when appropriate.

They want significant, empirically testable predictions made by public figures, that have no more than a five-year horizon. Topics (thus far) are politics, technology, and finance.

Research has shown that experts make predictions at a rate worse than chance. This site exists in order to hold people and media outlets accountable for pretending to see into an unpredictable future.

And despite being often-wrong, they keep at it. And people still listen to them and cite them as authorities.

via

It's Pure … Something

Tiger Woods’ game after surgery may be pure physics

Woods’ swing has been the envy of golfers around the world ever since he burst onto the professional scene in 1996.

His action is pure efficiency, combining hip, shoulder and wrist motion to exert the greatest possible force on the ball.

Pure efficiency? Does that make him the Carnot of golf. Perhaps we should refer to the swing as the “Woods cycle.”

The applied physics of his swing propels the club head at an estimated 125 mph at the point of impact with the ball but it also concentrates intense and repeated kinetic energy on his left knee.

Ooh, concentrated intense and repeated kinetic energy? That made me wince, but not from ligament damage.

Much of the rest of the article is about biology and medicine. I don’t know how badly mangled that is.

Modern Urawaza

Low-Tech Fixes for High-Tech Problems

“In postwar Japan, the economy wasn’t doing so great, so you couldn’t get everyday-use items like household cleaners,” says Lisa Katayama, author of “Urawaza,” a book named after the Japanese term for clever lifestyle tips and tricks. “So people looked for ways to do with what they had.”

Popular urawaza include picking up broken glass from the kitchen floor with a slice of bread, or placing houseplants on a water-soaked diaper to keep them watered during a vacation trip.

Today, Americans are finding their own tips and tricks for fixing misbehaving gadgets with supplies as simple as paper and adhesive tape.