Patently Obvious?

Inventing a New Economy

What patent applications can tell us about America’s economic prospects.

A quick glance suggests several conclusions: First, the view that a worldwide technological and innovative explosion began in the mid-1960s and continues until now is correct. The sheer number of patent applications—which had remained relatively static from the 1880s until the 1950s—suddenly grew dramatically, coinciding with the onset of the computer and telecom revolutions. Second, not surprisingly, the patent offices receiving the vast majority of this explosion have been those in nations with the greatest economic growth during that period—initially the United States and Japan and more recently China, Korea, and Russia.

This ties in with yesterday’s comment about basic research being the raw material of later applications.

Float Like a Butterfly, Sting like Faraday

It’s a knockout

Verena Kräusel and her colleagues performed their trick by beefing up an existing electromagnetic-forming machine. Such machines use a bank of capacitors to discharge a current rapidly through a coil. The coil converts the current into a powerful magnetic field. When the component to be worked is placed next to such a machine, the coil induces in it a corresponding field. Like poles repel, and the repulsion between the two fields is strong enough to make the metal distort.

Watt's Up With That?

YoGen Makes a Splash in Pull-String Charging

A 5 Watt charge can be generated with a very easy pull of the string. It doesn’t matter how fast or slow you pull, the same charge is generated.

I also got a demonstration of their prototype pedal-powered charger for laptops, which is reportedly capable of a 50 Watt charge, with just an easy push of a pedal.

The problem, of course, is that Watts is a unit of power, not energy, which is what they mean by “charge.”

In Space, No One Can Hear You Scream an Expletive

Quantum Rocketry: thoughts on space battles

A kinetic impactor is basically just a slug that goes really fast and hits the enemy fighter, tearing through the hull, damaging delicate systems with vibrations, throwing gyroscopes out of alignment so that they spin into their enclosures and explode into shards, puncturing tanks of fuel and other consumables, or directly killing the pilot and crew. You know…bullets. But it sounds much more technical and science-fictiony to say “mass driver” or “kinetic lance” or something of the sort.

A definite downside to kinetic weapons on a starfighter is that they would impart momentum to the fighter or change its mass properties. Very large cannons or missiles might therefore be impractical, unless the fighter can quickly compensate for what is essentially a large rocket firing. Even that compensation might give the enemy just the window he needs…

That’s pretty good. But there’s a nit:

But while we’re talking about focused energy weapons, lets just go with a tool that we already use to cut sheet metal on Earth: lasers. In space, laser light will travel almost forever without dissipating from diffraction.

It’s a common misconception that lasers give off perfectly collimated light, but it just ain’t so. Lasers typically have a Gaussian profile, so the beam will diverge, though pretty slowly if you start with a large beam. Small beams diverge faster, and one of the things that can give you fits when playing around with laser diodes and their incredibly tiny beams. (The divergence and the asymmetric profile and the astigmatism of the beam. Oy!)

But I don’t think this is a problem. In fact, for a space weapon, you might want to focus it down to a small spot (the corollary to not being collimated is that you can’t focus down to a point in Gaussian-Optics land, but bigger beams can have smaller spots) in order to do damage, while the beam generation power density is small. If you know the range, you can adjust the focus of the beam.

I like the idea of maneuvering and firing other weapons while you wait for the main capacitor to recharge. I also think maybe your kinetic weapon would be moveable, and you would need to account for the momentum kick in your attack plan — in fact, timing the firing of the weapon to give you desired maneuvering could be an important tactic. Such as firing to change your direction, or firing aft to hasten your departure.

On the Job

Best Man Rigs Newlyweds’ Bed To Tweet During Sex. Not Kidding.

Read the entire tweet stream from the bottom up if you want the full story. But basically, this guy was watching his friend’s house while they went on their honeymoon and he placed a device under their mattress. This device, which is similar to the one found here, is a pressure-sensitive pad that tweets out when sexual activity starts, when it ends, the force of the “action,” and a “frenzy” rating.

The twitter account

The Six Degrees of Integral-Spin Particles

Bacon number

I also checked on the spinless/spineless mixup that I got at Google, and come up with these:

skinless

stainless

(Wikipedia is great, but I do dislike that the search function has placed the emphasis on article titles, rather than content. This seems to have changed somewhat, since it now gives article links, too. I don’t recall that being the case in the past.)

h/t to baby astronaut for the bacon number

There's an Obscure Jim Otto Joke in Here Somewhere

Lightweight “triple-zero” house produces more energy than it uses

Built in 2000, it was the first in a series of buildings that are “triple-zero,” a concept developed by German architect and engineer Werner Sobek, which signifies that the building is energy self-sufficient (zero energy consumed), produces zero emissions, and is made entirely of recyclable materials (zero waste).

(Jim Otto. I’m guessing he wasn’t zero-emission.)