Of Oscillators and Switches

Switches, Oscillators, Yeast Cells, Magnets, Earthquakes, Cancer Cells, Brains….

An “oscillator” in this context can mean a wide variety of things: runners on a track, quantum-mechanical systems, fireflies flashing, rhythms in cells. The main thing is that when left alone, oscillators repeat themselves in a predictable way, cycling through the same motions or energy flows or whatever. When they are allowed to interact (runners adjusting their pace to match others, for example), they can fall into sync with each other – assuming the interaction is strong enough.

Be Glad it's not Unionized

What If Quantum Mechanics Went On Strike?

My nine-year-old son liked the NOVA episode on the quantum realm so much that he watched it twice, but when I told him that we are surrounded by quantum-powered technology, he was skeptical. “Point to any machine you can see,” I challenged him, as we stood in our family room.

His first selection was a glowing ornament hanging on our Christmas tree. “Aha,” I said, feeling vindicated. “See those little green lights? Those are LEDs—light-emitting diodes—that make light by passing electrons through a semiconductor material that has some extra ingredients mixed into it. As the electrons move from one side of the semiconductor to the other, they drop into a lower energy level and spit out a photon of light. The color of the light corresponds to the amount of energy the electrons lose.”

The Magic of Magnetism

There’s a very neat demonstration of how relativity is ingrained in electricity and magnetism, and it’s particularly nice because it involves length contraction. Of the two complimentary effects of relativity, time dilation is easier to see because of our ability to measure time precisely. Length contraction has the muon decay experiment, where it is observed that muons in the atmosphere survive to reach the ground, which is far longer than they should if time and length are not relative, and also in certain relativistic collisions which show that the nuclei must be length contracted for the dynamics to make sense.

But this one is simpler. Consider a charge moving along a path parallel to a current-carrying wire. (I’m going to use positive charges so that there are no pesky minus signs). For simplicity we’ll model this a series of charges with some spacing, all moving at a speed v, and a test charge moving with that same speed. Using the right-hand rule, the magnetic field is into the page below the wire, and the cross product right-hand rule tells us that the force will be toward the wire.

We also know there is no electrostatic force in this frame of reference — whatever charge densities we have, they are balanced. But now let’s look at what happens in other frames. Specifically, let’s look at the rest frame of the positive test charge: it is at rest, and the current is now due to the negative charges moving to the left.

Since the charge is at rest, there can be no magnetic force — it only acts on moving charges. And yet the frames have to agree on the attraction between the charge and the wire: it can’t just disappear in this frame. So where does it come from?

It’s an electrostatic force. The charge densities were equal in the lab frame, but now the negative charges are moving and the positive charges at at rest. This introduces length contraction for the negative charges, increasing their charge density relative to the positive ones, and we now have a net charge. So what we really have is this

This gives rise to an electrostatic attraction, which is exactly the force we had in the lab frame. (If you’re interested in the details of the derivation, one example is here. Sorry. Writing it out in Latex is a bit of a pain.)

In any intermediate frame, we would see a mix of the two forces; as we move into a frame with some speed other than v, we will see a smaller value for both the current and the speed of the charge, meaning the magnetic force falls off (and quadratically), but the electrostatic force appears in the right amount and gives us the net force we expect. And, of course, it’s not magic. It’s relativity.

Gifts from the Beyond Neutral Zone

New toy!

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

This is a hexbug larva, and yes, it looks a bit like a baby Ceti eel from The Wrath of Khan. It’s autonomous, so the redirection is happening on its own. What’s going on?

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Little flashy infrared LED, with a sensor below it. (I used my IR webcam to film these shots). It’s intermittent, which I assume is to screen out any DC signal from background light and detect pulses in the same pattern.

Here’s the underside, where you can see the locomotion details. Not sure of the sex, though, or what happens when it grows up.
You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

The Shroud of Duration

Skulls in the Stars: So, what is a “temporal cloak”, anyway?

Loosely speaking, this has also been referred to as a “history editor”. Naturally, the discussion of “cloaking” has again brought out references to “Harry Potter cloaks” and other dramatic imagery; the reality is much more mundane, but still fascinating — and an amazing achievement. Let’s take a look at what was done, what was not done — and why it’s quite cool!

First, let’s get rid of some misconceptions that the terminology naturally brings to mind. The terms “space-time cloak” and “history editor” make it sound like the device is ripping a hole in the fabric of space-time itself — like a time machine equipped with a big eraser! This is definitely not what is happening here! There is no manipulation of time itself, but rather a manipulation of a beam of light to hide something that the light would otherwise detect.

An analogy for what this isn’t is a strobe light. A strobe can freeze our perception of motion, but not the motion itself — you just aren’t getting that information. This system is hiding information in a different way.

Lights! Camera! Action! Mostly Lights, Though

We had a film crew from the History Channel at the Observatory a few days ago, filming a segment for an upcoming special on inventions that changed the world. One of these is the clock, so naturally they wanted to speak to some people who could tell them about clocks. I showed them around the lab and they liked the setting a lot more than any of our operational clocks; they’re all nicely packaged up and quite boring. (One type — the hydrogen maser — is literally a black box, and the fountain physics package looks like a water heater.)

So they filmed a segment in our lab, and since I was there making sure they didn’t touch anything they shouldn’t be touching (they didn’t — they were quite well-behaved), they had me and one of my lab-mates stand in the background, pretending to work at one of the optical tables. We might end up on screen for ten seconds or so in the final cut.

Being geeks meant that we drooled a bit over the equipment that they brought. This is part of their lighting system, a bank of LEDs, which has the advantage over traditional equipment that it draws much less power since LEDs are much more efficient. This means they can run it off of a battery and not have to worry about whether there is an outlet nearby, and it also doesn’t heat up very much.

 

With the lights at full power it saturates the camera.

 

Turned down a bit you can see the LEDs a little more clearly.