Sick. As. A. Dog.
Gah.
Sick. As. A. Dog.
Gah.
But I’d watch wrestling like this
Quantum Rocketry: thoughts on space battles
A kinetic impactor is basically just a slug that goes really fast and hits the enemy fighter, tearing through the hull, damaging delicate systems with vibrations, throwing gyroscopes out of alignment so that they spin into their enclosures and explode into shards, puncturing tanks of fuel and other consumables, or directly killing the pilot and crew. You know…bullets. But it sounds much more technical and science-fictiony to say “mass driver” or “kinetic lance” or something of the sort.
…
A definite downside to kinetic weapons on a starfighter is that they would impart momentum to the fighter or change its mass properties. Very large cannons or missiles might therefore be impractical, unless the fighter can quickly compensate for what is essentially a large rocket firing. Even that compensation might give the enemy just the window he needs…
That’s pretty good. But there’s a nit:
But while we’re talking about focused energy weapons, lets just go with a tool that we already use to cut sheet metal on Earth: lasers. In space, laser light will travel almost forever without dissipating from diffraction.
It’s a common misconception that lasers give off perfectly collimated light, but it just ain’t so. Lasers typically have a Gaussian profile, so the beam will diverge, though pretty slowly if you start with a large beam. Small beams diverge faster, and one of the things that can give you fits when playing around with laser diodes and their incredibly tiny beams. (The divergence and the asymmetric profile and the astigmatism of the beam. Oy!)
But I don’t think this is a problem. In fact, for a space weapon, you might want to focus it down to a small spot (the corollary to not being collimated is that you can’t focus down to a point in Gaussian-Optics land, but bigger beams can have smaller spots) in order to do damage, while the beam generation power density is small. If you know the range, you can adjust the focus of the beam.
I like the idea of maneuvering and firing other weapons while you wait for the main capacitor to recharge. I also think maybe your kinetic weapon would be moveable, and you would need to account for the momentum kick in your attack plan — in fact, timing the firing of the weapon to give you desired maneuvering could be an important tactic. Such as firing to change your direction, or firing aft to hasten your departure.
Report: Exemptions benefit athletes
An Associated Press review of admissions data submitted to the NCAA by most of the 120 schools in college football’s top tier shows that athletes enjoy strikingly better odds of having admission requirements bent on their behalf.
Wow. Really?
Aquarium lowers water levels after feeding turtles brussel sprouts
[T]he turtles, like humans, are prone to heavy bouts of flatulence after eating the vegetables.
Last year a turtle at a Sealife Centre triggered overflow alarms in the middle of the night after the splashes from gassy bubbles hit overflow sensors.
Now the Yarmouth turtle tank -12 feet in depth and width holding 250,000 litres of water along with George the 3ft long green turtle – has been partially emptied for the festive season.
I wonder how this affects their buoyancy and swimming speed.
Skulls in the Stars: Lord Kelvin vs. the Aether! (1901)
[T]hese speculations resulted in a number of interesting results. For instance, we have noted previously that Earnshaw’s theorem (1839), an important result in electromagnetic theory, arose from an attempt to determine the forces that hold the aether together. In 1902, Lord Rayleigh attempted to detect the aether-induced “length contraction” by measuring the birefringence of moving objects, an ingenious attempt that gave a negative result.
In the broadest sense, a “good” theory is one which raises interesting questions that may inevitably be tested by experiment. Even if it proves to be fundamentally incorrect in the end, it has spurred numerous theoretical and experimental results.