There is no Fun in Funding

Real Lives and White Lies in the Funding of Scientific Research

K.’s plight (an authentic one) illustrates how the present funding system in science eats its own seed corn [2]. To expect a young scientist to recruit and train students and postdocs as well as producing and publishing new and original work within two years (in order to fuel the next grant application) is preposterous. It is neither right nor sensible to ask scientists to become astrologists and predict precisely the path their research will follow—and then to judge them on how persuasively they can put over this fiction. It takes far too long to write a grant because the requirements are so complex and demanding. Applications have become so detailed and so technical that trying to select the best proposals has become a dark art. For postdoctoral fellowships, there are so many arcane and restrictive rules that applicants frequently find themselves to be of the wrong nationality, in the wrong lab, too young, or too old. Young scientists who make the career mistake of concentrating on their research may easily miss the deadline for the only grant they might have won. Research institutes with their own funds can solve these problems, but grant holders like K. do not have any flexibility. The real world of science has no tidy banks of pigeonholes, each one occupied for a standard period by an exemplary student or a perfect postdoc.

The Cheeseburger of Essay Forms

The List of N Things

Some of the work of reading an article is understanding its structure—figuring out what in high school we’d have called its “outline.” Not explicitly, of course, but someone who really understands an article probably has something in his brain afterward that corresponds to such an outline. In a list of n things, this work is done for you. Its structure is an exoskeleton.

As well as being explicit, the structure is guaranteed to be of the simplest possible type: a few main points with few to no subordinate ones, and no particular connection between them.

Because the main points are unconnected, the list of n things is random access. There’s no thread of reasoning you have to follow. You could read the list in any order. And because the points are independent of one another, they work like watertight compartments in an unsinkable ship. If you get bored with, or can’t understand, or don’t agree with one point, you don’t have to give up on the article. You can just abandon that one and skip to the next. A list of n things is parallel and therefore fault tolerant.

Letters of Note

Letters of Note

Letters of Note is an attempt to gather and sort fascinating letters, postcards, telegrams, faxes, and even emails. Scans/photos where possible. Fakes will be sneered at.

Somehow “tweets of note” just doesn’t seem like it would measure up. “That was an epic text message you sent, Carl.” Nah.

Physics Buzz presented their Friday Fermi Problem, well, last Friday:

Assuming you’re not in a big lecture hall and the professor shuts the door at the start of class, how long does it take for you and your classmates to deplete the oxygen enough to feel it?

They have presented the answer, and there is some additional commentary at Fine Structure about the problem of CO2 buildup (from Rhett of Dot Physics; which just supports my suspicion that physics bloggers are the main readers of physics blogs)

Math Goes to the Movies

The mysterious equilibrium of zombies

In any decade there are really only a handful of movies about math (“Proof” comes to mind, as well as “A Beautiful Mind”), but a surprising number of movies that end up embodying math, even if it’s accidental. “Six Degrees of Separation” is based on the math of social networks. Thrillers have a special propensity for edgy twists on game theory. And what is a disease-outbreak movie if not an illustration of mathematical epidemiology, with puffy suits? To see movies through their math, sometimes, is to watch a whole different drama.

Pink and Green

Pink, green

There is no spoon green dot. It’s an afterimage from seeing the pink.

Things to add — if you look away, you’ll see green afterimages. Also, if you stare at any of the pink dots for a while, they (or the rest) will still tend to disappear. When you stare at one point, images can fade, especially if they are dim and away from the point at which you are looking, which is a problem in astronomy — you’re looking at a dim star, and it has a tendency to just disappear. This, I’ve learned, is called Troxler’s fading (the wikipedia page uses this illusion as an example). We normally don’t experience this, because we tend to move our eyes a few times per second.

Update: The “pink, green” link is dead, so try this one : Lilac chaser

I'm a Monkey! Monkey, Monkey, Monkey!

Fewer paying speed-camera tickets in Arizona

[W]hen state Department of Public Safety officers served 37 unpaid photo-enforcement tickets to Vontesmar recently, he wasn’t fazed.

The photos all show the driver wearing a monkey mask.

“Not one of them there is a picture where you can identify the driver,” Vontesmar said. “The ball’s in their court. I sent back all these ones I got with a copy of my driver’s license and said, ‘It’s not me. I’m not paying them.’ ”