Games People at Hotels Play

So I’m at ScienceOnline 2011 for the weekend; I drove down Thursday, checked in and apparently missed DrSkyskull in the lobby when I went to the bar to get dinner. And then I collapsed. As I write this Friday morning I’m skipping the tours because I knew I wouldn’t be up to it; I went to the gym instead, figuring that would help me shake off my travel hangover.

The elliptical was a really fast track. Insanely fast, as compared to the one I use at work. I know that the one at work might not be calibrated properly, but I find it curious that the one at the hotel was indicating at least 10% faster than what I’ve been doing the past week. The exercise room is located next to the pool, so the air is warm and humid (somewhat less so than normal because it’s cold outside, and the window condenses a bunch of water) and that promotes sweat. Profuse sweat doesn’t help keep you cool, but it can make you feel like you’re doing really well in your workout. And the scale was reading ~3 lbs lighter than the scales at work and at the doctor’s office.

I wonder if it’s deliberate. It gives you positive feedback on your workout and makes you feel good about it, especially if you might not be at the top of your game from being on the road. Gives you a good mental association with the hotel. I read stories about how much effort goes into the psychology of casinos and all the tricks they employ, so it doesn’t seem out of the realm of possibility that someone’s gaming the exercise equipment to get a tiny edge in getting repeat business.

Or maybe it’s all about having little to think about on the machine, I had an awesome workout, and I can have the chocolate cake for dessert.

You'll Put Your Eye Out, Kid!

BA review: The Spyder III Arctic Blue laser from Wicked Lasers

But the blue lasers… I’ve heard about them. The brightness of a laser depends mostly on the power used*. A typical red laser might have a power of about 5 milliWatts (5 mW). My green one has a power of roughly 160 mW, which is a lot more than the red one. The blue one, though, has a power of 1250 milliWatts, nearly 8 times that of the green one!
So yeah, I wanted to try one out.

* Color is the next biggest factor, since our eyes are much more sensitive to green light than blue, or even red. Beam focus is another factor, and so on.

(edit: post seems to have disappeared. Erased from existence, using far less than 1.21 GW. Here is a copy of it from an aggregator site)

Thoughts:

More than a Watt of laser power in a handheld device? Damn dangerous. I agree, this is almost like having a gun in terms of safety & handling issues. The potential damage that could occur through stupidity and carelessness is significant. It comes with safety goggles, which not everyone will use, and even if Luke is wearing his blast shield while he waves his light-saber around, what about everyone else? I see trouble a’brewing.

 

 

The BA (sort of) underplays the significance of color. Color, or more specifically, wavelength, is in fact a huge factor in how bright a laser appears. In the early days of green lasers being available, they used some shady advertising tricks to exploit this by telling you the green laser was as bright as a red laser of a certain power, typically 5 mW.  But in the fine print you found that the green laser had less than a milliWatt of actual output they were leveraging the fact that the sensitivity near 550 nm is more than five times the sensitivity out past 650 nm. So the BA has rigged the answer a little by using large difference in power. A green laser is going to look brighter than a red laser that has twice the power.

I suspect that one of the issues here is that the eye’s sensitivity is usually portrayed on a linear scale, like here (fig 154), which shows the photopic (light-adjusted) sensitivity ranging from 400 nm out to 700 nm, which is the usually-cited range. Notice that scotopic, or dark-adjusted vision really kills the sensitivity to the red, which is a killer in an optics lab using red lasers. Turning off the lights has a smaller effect in one’s ability to detect a spot because of the loss in sensitivity fighting the reduction in background.

But the effect isn’t best portrayed on a linear scale, because you can still detect photons beyond those boundaries, and the linear scale doesn’t give this impression. If you look at it on a log scale, you see that while the photopic vision has a shoulder near 700 nm, it doesn’t stay flat. You can see light out near 800 nm (we use a lot of 780 nm in the lab, for Rubidium, and you can see diffuse reflections from a few-mW source), but your eye is a million times less sensitive to it than to green light. Put another way, if you see even dim light in the near-infrared (NIR), it’s fairly powerful. I once saw a spot from a misaligned 852 nm laser (used for trapping Cesium), which was disconcerting, because it must have been really, really fracking powerful.

One might cut the BA some slack, because my examples aren’t laser pointers, and while he said lasers, he probably meant laser pointer and was thinking of only those wavelengths — color kind of restricting one to the 400nm-700 nm range — rather than what one might find in a lab. And they don’t make laser pointers in the IR, because what would be the point? Right? Well, not so fast. Green laser pointers are commonly made from pumped, frequency-doubled IR light, and this arrangement can let a lot of the IR through if there is no filter, and there may not be one. So you can get a blast of 808 nm light from the pump, and 1064 nm from the beam that doesn’t get doubled to 532 nm. While often the bright green light would trigger a blink to help save your eyes, it’s possible that it won’t, because light that has refracted or diffracted (phenomena which depend on wavelength) won’t line up anymore. You could potentially get an eyeful of IR, while the green spot doesn’t hit your eye. By the time you notice a problem, it will likely be because retinal damage has already been done.

So color is a big deal in how bright something appears. Let’s be careful out there.

Physics Wins Again

It’s all about the energy balance

Twinkie diet helps nutrition professor lose 27 pounds

His premise: That in weight loss, pure calorie counting is what matters most — not the nutritional value of the food.
The premise held up: On his “convenience store diet,” he shed 27 pounds in two months.
For a class project, Haub limited himself to less than 1,800 calories a day. A man of Haub’s pre-dieting size usually consumes about 2,600 calories daily. So he followed a basic principle of weight loss: He consumed significantly fewer calories than he burned.
His body mass index went from 28.8, considered overweight, to 24.9, which is normal. He now weighs 174 pounds.

2/3 of his calories from junk food. He improved his cholesterol, too.

Why so Blue?

Causes of Color

Why use a black body radiator as a standard, when no such thing exists?

It turns out that black body radiation provides us with a set of very precise working equations that relate the temperature of an object to the light it emits. Working from the ideal and using Planck”s law, we can predict the energy distribution across the spectrum for a given temperature. The total emitted power is calculated using the Stefan-Boltzmann law. The wavelength of the peak emission, and hence the color that dominates for this temperature, is provided by Wien’s displacement law. Knowing the ideal case allows us to predict or calculate actual values by correcting for the imperfections of actual hot objects.

h/t to ewmon

Dem Bones

… and Titanium foamy goodness. Titanium foam is just as flexible and rigid as real human bone

The secret behind the new titanium foam implants is a foam-like structure that resembles spongiosa inside human bones, and a powder metallurgy-based molding process that consists of open-cell polyurethane (PU) foams being saturated with a solution that contains a binding medium and a fine titanium powder. The powder adheres to the foams cellular structures, and the binding agents and the PU are vaporized. The end result is a “semblance of the foam structures, which is ultimately sintered.”

Revenge of the Ant Overlords

Vdara visitor: ‘Death ray’ scorched hair

The “hot spot” was visible during one of the visits, but no guests were in its reach. An employee pointed out the zone and said it was “like a magnifying glass that shines down” over a space about 10 feet by 15 feet, which moves as the Earth rotates. At this time of year, the bright reflection is present for about an hour and a half, both before noon and after, according to the young man.

Also: Sunbather Singed by Shiny Hotel’s Reflected “Death Rays”

Kids, Don't Try This … Anywhere

Kids Playing With Laser Pointers May Be Aiming for Eye Trouble

Sadly, this is too common, and this is just the latest incident.

He told doctors that he purchased the laser pointer so that he could pop balloons from a distance, burn holes in paper cards and burn holes in his sister’s sneakers.

Schmid said the boy wasn’t sure if the laser was dangerous, and he definitely didn’t know it could cause immediate eye injury.

I have a hard time connecting these two statements. Knows it would burn holes in things, but didn’t know it was dangerous.