Pedant on the Loose!

Blake’s mention of a “First Night” celebration in Boston, coupled with memories of many stories about similar celebrations in upstate New York (Albany and Saratoga), have triggered this.

The problem: “First Night” celebrations are held on New Year’s Eve, which is the LAST night of the year. I mean seriously, WTF? After midnight, it’s A.M. — Morning*. The organizers must be the same bunch of differently-abled mathletes that celebrated the new millennium when the calendar rolled over to 2000.

*Don’t believe me? Call someone normally asleep at 2 A.M. and see of the they don’t yell at you for waking them up at two in the morning!

Oh, By the Way …

Whoever called a little while back, woke me up and asked me, “Who is this?”

I hope you get your own special circle in Hell. Screw you.

(Phone calls in the middle of the night are invariably bad news. Either a wrong number, or some sort of emergency. Either way you’re jolted awake, with that adrenaline release.)

JW, Please Purchase a Clue

Because you are a valued customer and your opinion is important to us, we would like to periodically ask you to provide feedback regarding your experience with our hotels. The feedback we collect from our customers is used to make improvements to our hotels and processes so we can better serve you.

However, our records indicate that you have not given us permission to send customer survey invitations to you at this email address. If you would like the opportunity to provide occasional feedback, please give us permission to contact you (https://www.blahblahblah) at this email address to complete future surveys. This permission is for research purposes only and does not give us permission to send you any marketing or promotional information.

Thank you in advance for your feedback and for spending your time away from home at Marriott.

Sincerely,

J.W. Marriott, Jr.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Marriott International, Inc.

Um, no? Not in a house, not with a mouse?

Or, to use a phrase I learned in the navy: Not only no, but @%#$ no!

The point of “please don’t use my email to contact me” was “don’t contact me.”

The Corner of My Mind

Body still on west-coast time, but with an east-coast schedule. There is much caffeine in my future.

Thoughts from this past week:

Airline travel really sucks. There is no space in coach, and the seats are really uncomfortable — my back still hurts. Next thing you know they will charge for air.

Note to TSA guy: if you are going to admonish me for not following the procedure going through the checkpoint (my shoes were on top of my laptop), it would help if someone would tell us what the procedures actually are. They aren’t posted anywhere. So I’ll say now what I couldn’t say then: bite me.

To the lady that tilted her seat back, almost pinning me in. And then giving me and my row-mates a movie-theater international-symbol-for-annoyed scowling-over-the-shoulder glance every time someone got up (it’s a six-hour flight) and having to grab your headrest. Caveat emptor. Thanks for finally cluing in somewhere over Nevada and straightening your seat.

It is not really comforting to know that the cabbies in Monterey are just as crazy as the ones in DC. We ran a red light. Not a yellow-oh-it-just-turned red light. A red, one-thousand-one, one-thousand-two, one-thousand three red light. We weren’t in that much of a hurry. The tip was a thank-you for not killing us.

The government travel system shouldn’t book me on a flight as standby. It’s not fun to get to the counter and be told, “Oh, we’re oversold on this flight. We’ll try to get you on.” I made it, but … United — you overbooked a 28-passenger flight by at least 4 seats. What’s up with that? Even if you really routinely get >15% cancellations, do you not understand small-number statistics? It was a hop from Monterey to San Francisco, and you paid cab fare to SF and a round-trip ticket for each one. Wow.

Murphy’s law does not disappoint. Backup scripts failed a week ago, knowing I wasn’t around to check. Of course, most of us were gone, so there wasn’t much to back up. Barely made a dent in the stuff that piled up while I was away.

The Value of Sports Statistics

Chad’s got a post up about how Baseball Statistics Are Crap. I’ve got a different beef.

(There are, certainly, a lot of dubious statistics in baseball. I just don’t agree that things are as bad as Chad says but maybe it’s just that I’m used to the idiosyncrasies. I do understand the infield fly rule, after all. If that weirdness makes sense, maybe the weird statistics do, too.)

Anyway, my objection is that even with these simplified statistics, the sportscasters and writers read too much into them. They don’t understand what the statistics are saying, and the value of statistics is to be able to compare players. In baseball it’s not so bad — even if the stats are flawed, a player hitting .356 is objectively a better hitter, by this measure than one who is hitting .290. But what does “by this measure” mean? In baseball, you can hit for average or for power — there are different skills and abilities useful to the team, and you want to find the statistic that is appropriate to the skill you are trying to quantify.

In this regard, I think, football is an example where the reporters are a great abuser of statistics. And this goes beyond saying “turnover ratio” when “differential” is meant (one thing that’s gotten better over the years). The main abuse, I think, is saying that accuracy is measured by completion percentage, and this seemingly happens all the time.

Accuracy is your ability to hit a target, and if you want to compare apples-to-apples, the target should be the same one. A stationary target at 10 yards is easier to hit than a moving one at 40 yards. A better receiver, who can get open, is easier to hit, and also affects the ability for other receivers to get open. You can have a receiver who drops the ball even though it’s “right at the numbers,” or one who catches everything thrown his way. When nobody’s open and he’s trapped, a quarterback can take a sack or throw the ball away, giving him an incompletion. All of that affects completion percentage, and none of it reflects accuracy.

Chad Pennington is touted as an “accurate quarterback” by many sports journalists, who, in the next breath, mention he has a weak arm and dumps the ball off quite often. Short passes. Connection? I think so!

My favorite example is Donovan McNabb. When Terrell Owens was about to join the team, analysts were all cautious about how Owens would tolerate the inaccurate McNabb, who had never completed 59% of his passes. Until that year, when he completed 64%, and everyone was saying how accurate he had become. Owens leaves, and the completions percentage drops back down. (It’s up again this season, and last — he’s got better receivers, and he dumps the ball off to Westbrook when he has to)

Point Counterpoint

Greg Laden has some valid beefs in The Truth Is In There

Yes, the LHC people should have disclosed the faulty transformer immediately. It was an absolute mistake not to do so. No disagreement there.

However,

The hubris. It hurts. That these scientists think that they can and should do this is wrong and, frankly, scary. I for one do not believe that the LHC is going to make little black holes that would eventually suck the earth into themselves. But I’ll tell you this: The reason that I know that this is not going to happen is not because any scientist ever explained this to me. I asked for such explanations, and I got bullshit, I got incomprehensible formulas, I got insults, I got “a we’re very smart and this is what we believe” and I got hubris. Then, I went and looked into the science and figured it out for myself. I had to do that because the science community that is linked to or interested in this project seems often to act with a misguided sense of self importance, and an insulting belief that others cannot possibly comprehend what they are talking about on any level. And now, we see evidence that this same community seems to feel that actual truth about actual complexity about actual complex things is something we should not be allowed to share in.

There’s a different perspective to this, and perhaps there are other scientists who share in my frustration when I hear/read such complaints about the accessibility of science.

You want explanations, you want to be informed. That’s great. I’m all for it. And there are a lot of conduits for information about the LHC out there, as well as other research. And scientists should do even more to make their research accessible.

But (you knew there was a “but” coming. Either that or “Jane, you ignorant slut”)

Nonscientists have to meet scientists partway. I can explain my research to a lot of people — what we do, why it’s useful. Any researcher should be able to do a five-minute summary like this. But this isn’t all that you’re asking for here. You, and others, want to understand what I’m telling you at a level that is simply not possible without all the equations and “incomprehensible formulas.” They aren’t incomprehensible if you’ve spent some time learning the relevant material and the use of that description is very telling. The problem is that the relevant material took me years to learn, and I simply can’t pass along that level of understanding to you in five minutes. And there’s an attitude, possessed by some, that not only should I be able to do this knowledge transfer, but that it should be easy to for them learn.

And that attitude is, frankly, crap. This isn’t easy stuff. The five-minute summary I can give you is just that — a five-minute summary. You won’t be qualified to do much with it. It isn’t enough to give you interactional expertise unless you have already put in the extensive time to learn enough of the underlying science. And if you haven’t, or aren’t willing to do so, don’t blame me. I can’t speak to the hubris to which Greg feels he was exposed, but I’ve had several similar exchanges myself in discussions with nonscientists where I can see how my attitude might be interpreted as hubris, but was really frustration. You want me to explain relativity or quantum mechanics to you, in detail, and you have objections to it because it’s not intuitive, yet you don’t even have a semester of physics under your belt? Sorry, but that’s just not reasonable in a brief exchange. And you think that’s my fault? No, it’s not. I didn’t answer a question to your satisfaction, only it turns out the question was poorly phrased? Again, not my fault. Similarly, a detailed explanation of why the LHC is not going to destroy the earth is complicated, and to get a good answer you have to ask the right question. You go to a website, and you get one layer of explanation, and even that may be discussion by analogy (which has inherent shortcomings), because they are going to assume you don’t have a physics degree.

By asking for extensive detail and demanding accessibility, you have overconstrained the problem. There is no solution that fits all of the requirements. Removing that extra constraint is up to you.

BTW CERN’s has a FAQ on the matter. Was this the hubris? I just don’t see it.

Suffering Fools

Assistant to Assistant Professor

I hope people don’t call me elitist when I claim that most people with high school education could easily do administrative assistant job. Primarily all they have to do is keep track of paperwork – like travel reimbursements, schedules, purchase orders, that kind of stuff. It’s not that complicated, but it’s not a good position for chronic procrastinators or disorganized people. And yet they do lose things, or forget about what they have been asked to do on regular basis – it’s almost as if the ONLY people hired into these positions are disorganized procrastinators.

I’ve survived four departmental administrative assistants in the 10 years I’ve been in my current job. Three have been pretty good, and one was hopeless. (There are other support staff, too, though there are times where they are support in name only). I remember trying to train hopeless to keep track of purchases in our database, with the idea that I would do less purchasing and more physics. Everything was set up — all of the codes and categories — so all that was required was data entry and the paperwork. The computer for the data was in hopeless’s office, but we had a program that would allow others to access the computer, and you would see the actual screen in real time. More than once I logged on while hopeless was doing some data entry, and some part of the entry would be wrong — some typo so that the program didn’t recognize some piece of data. There would be a popup that asked “XXX is not in the system. Would you like to set it up?” And I’d watch, in horror, as the cursor moved to “YES” and was then clicked. It got to be like yelling at the TV screen during a bad movie (or football), only instead of “Pick up the gun, you idiot!” (or “Throw it out of bounds! Not to the other team!”) it was “No! No! Click NO! Auuugh!”

I’d eventually go back and fix the bad entries, and learned to just not watch the horror as it unfolded. Turns out that not much of my time was saved, when all was said and done.

JaneDoh, in the comments, adds

[W]hen I worked in a govt lab, I did as much of my own paperwork as possible, including travel arrangements, travel reimbursement, entering orders into the computer system, and sending important faxes. I didn’t trust our admin with ANYTHING.

The government (or at least my little corner of it) has moved away from the model of having someone arrange travel and do reimbursements. It’s done online these days, so you have to do it yourself. Our current departmental assistant is so overworked as it is that I do all this other “important” stuff myself anyway. It’s not a lack of competence that would delay these things getting done, it’s the huge stack of other work that also has to be done.

As far as the sentiment that anyone with a high school education can do this, I don’t know — I don’t think that’s a fair assessment. There’s all this empirical data (anecdotal though it may be, it does establish that these people exist). And were I to transform myself into Pedantic Man, I would point out that anyone with a college degree possesses a high school education — they just have more. Incoherent Ponderer, presumably, has the requisite education, but went on and obtained advanced degrees. So are we counting everyone who graduates high school? Because it’s a tough sell to get that potential future PhD to want to be an office assistant. Or anyone else who aspires to another job, for the challenge, pay or whatever else they happen to desire in their employment.

What is really being requested here is someone who has a high school education, is capable of more — they have the intelligence, maturity, drive, etc. — but for some reason never moved on and up, and yet are fulfilled doing a job that we’re all complaining about but don’t want to do ourselves. Somehow I don’t think there’s a huge pool of these job candidates out there. I think we’re stuck with the reality that the more competent a person is, generally, the higher they will rise. And as long as office assistants are not valued (market-wise) particularly highly, we’re stuck with what we can get. If you have a good one, consider yourself lucky.

I Beg to Differ

OK — beg? No, not so much.

Dell deceived customers, judge says

I have no complaint about any alleged bait-and-switch. It’s this:

“Our goal has been, and continues to be, to provide the best customer experience possible,” spokesman Jess Blackburn said in a written statement to CNN.

Cough, splurt. Get on it, please.

I had the misfortune and displeasure of buying from Dell recently. I was buying a computer for someone else, and they had gone to the trouble of configuring and customizing it, and saving an e-quote. Which I could not retrieve — I apparently can only retrieve quotes for some predefined work group. So if you aren’t set up in the system, I can’t buy from the quote. My colleague didn’t create an account, so going back and even accessing the quote on his computer was problematic. At that point, if this had been any other purchase, I would have been shopping elsewhere, but approval had been obtained for this particular machine. Eventually — it took about an hour — we prevailed. I don’t see the business advantage in making it hard to buy something.

But the story doesn’t end there, since I had to get a replacement keyboard a few weeks later. Except there’s no actual part number on the invoice, and searching on Dell’s website led me to a dead-end. I had to pretend to buy a new computer to figure out what to order.

And even that is fraught with danger. I tried to replace a video card for an older machine last year, and found a list of compatible parts, but the Dell site wanted to charge me tax (government purchases are normally tax-exempt) so I ordered the part elsewhere. And it didn’t fit. An AGP vs PCI problem. When I contacted Dell to tell them their information was bad, I was assured that the card did fit my computer — it says so on the website!

Contrast those experiences with Amazon. I bought a new pocket-camera last week (SLRs don’t always travel well), and after taking a few pictures I noticed a spot in the same location on each. It became sharper when I zoomed in, and didn’t go away when I cleaned the lens. So it was inside somewhere. Went to their website, clicked on the “exchange this” option, and they overnighted a new camera to me (works great!).

In Case You're Homesick for the Keystone State

Last week I was vacationing in Bills’ country — it’s tough being a Dolphins fan these days, but especially so within an hour or so of Buffalo — getting my fix of hot wings (not hard to find pretty much anywhere these days) and Beef on ‘Weck (still a local phenomenon), which required me to travel through Pennsylvania.

Eleven freaking “work areas” on the way up. Similar on the way back, with some changes to the route, though I didn’t bother to count. Not one of them was “active” and no workers to be seen, though to be fair it was on the weekend, but I’ve seen this during the week on other trips. Ugh. Is “Under Construction” the new state motto?

Anyway, if anyone in the DC area is lonely for this, the stretch of Rt 50 just east of Glebe Rd. in northern Virginia has been a work area since early July, and Friday is just the second day I’ve seen workers there.

Dilbert Betabert Sucksbert

I’ve been putting up with the new Dilbert website abomination for however long, a couple of months at least, and the fact that Scott Adams is a fellow Hartwick alum doesn’t mean I’m going to cut him any slack — the website breaks the first commandment of web design.

1. Thou shalt not abuse Flash.

Adobe’s (ADBE) popular Web animation technology powers everything from the much-vaunted Nike (NKE) Plus Web site for running diehards to many humdrum banner advertisements. But the technology can easily be abused—excessive, extemporaneous animations confuse usability and bog down users’ Web browsers.

What’s more, he’s admitted it. But it turns out that there’s a “fast Dilbert” web site.

This alternate site is a minor secret, mentioned only here and in the text footnote to the regular site as “Linux/Unix.”

So rejoice, go there instead (if you read Dilbert online) and pray that they look at web traffic statistics.